Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24687247›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2015

In situ antimicrobial activity on oral biofilm: essential oils vs. 0.2 % chlorhexidine.

Victor Quintas, Isabel Prada-López, Juan Carlos Prados-Frutos, Inmaculada Tomás

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02124655 phase4completednot on this map

Antiplaque Effect of Essential Oils and 0.2% Chlorhexidine on an in Situ Model of Oral Biofilm Growth: a Randomised Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Santiago de CompostelaRan2012Enrolled15ConditionsOral Biofilm, Mouthwash, PeriodontitisArmsEssential oils, 0.2% chlorhexidine, Sterile water
NCT02946814 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Immediate Effect and Substantivity of the Essential Oils Without Alcohol on the Oral Biofilm in Situ. A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Santiago de CompostelaRan2016Enrolled20ConditionsBiofilms, Substantivity, Oils, EssentialArmsessential oils, essential oils without mouthwash, sterile water
NCT03146390 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Essential Oils With and Without Alcohol: in Vivo Antibacterial Effect

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Santiago de CompostelaRan2017 to 2017Enrolled20ConditionsOral Biofilm, Dental Plaque, PeriodontitisArmsEssential oils, Alcohol free essential oils, Water
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Journal of oral microbiology · 2018
    Article
  13. Frontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Victor QuintasOral Sciences Research Group, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Santiago de Compostela University, C./ Entrerrios s/n, 15872, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Isabel Prada-López
Juan Carlos Prados-Frutos
Inmaculada Tomás
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to evaluate the in situ antibacterial activity of a mouthwash containing essential oils (M-EO) on undisturbed de novo plaque-like biofilm (PL-biofilm) up to 7 h after its application. PATIENTS AND

methodsAn appliance was designed to hold six glass disks on the buccal sides of the lower teeth, allowing PL-biofilm growth. Fifteen healthy volunteers wore the appliance for 48 h and then performed a M-EO. Disks were removed after 30 s and at 1, 3, 5, and 7 h later. After a washout period, the same procedure was repeated with a M-WATER and a M-0.2 % chlorhexidine. After PL-biofilm vital staining, samples were analyzed using a confocal laser scanning microscope.

resultsAt 30 s after M-EO, the levels of bacterial vitality were 1.18 %, significantly lower than that of the basal sample (p < 0.001). After 7 h, the antibacterial effect of essential oils was still patent with a 47.86 % difference in bacterial vitality compared to the basal sample (p < 0.001).

conclusionA single M-EO presents high antibacterial immediate activity and penetration capacity in situ and a substantivity which lasts for at least 7 h after its application over de novo biofilm. These results were better than those observed with 0.2 % chlorhexidine under the same conditions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A single M-EO is an effective measure against the de novo biofilm, presenting a good alternative to clorhexidine such as a preoperative rinse, in periodontal procedures or post-treatment applications.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Infective Agents, LocalBiofilmsChlorhexidineCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedMouthwashesOils, VolatileAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineMouthwashesOils, Volatile

Identifiers

PMID24687247
OpenAlexW2035575770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.