Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24687119›Full record

ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2014

Low invasive in vivo tissue sampling for monitoring biomarkers and drugs during surgery.

Barbara Bojko, Krzysztof Gorynski, German A Gomez-Rios, Jan M Knaak, Tiago Machuca, Erasmus Cudjoe, Vinzent N Spetzler, Michael Hsin, Marcelo Cypel, Markus Selzner and 3 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Solid-phase microextraction technology forTrends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Barbara BojkoDepartment of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Krzysztof GorynskiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
German A Gomez-RiosDepartment of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Jan M KnaakDepartment of Surgery, Multi Organ Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Tiago MachucaLatner Thoracic Surgery Research Laboratories, Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Erasmus CudjoeDepartment of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Vinzent N SpetzlerDepartment of Surgery, Multi Organ Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Michael HsinLatner Thoracic Surgery Research Laboratories, Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Marcelo CypelLatner Thoracic Surgery Research Laboratories, Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Markus SelznerDepartment of Surgery, Multi Organ Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mingyao LiuLatner Thoracic Surgery Research Laboratories, Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Shaf KeshjaveeLatner Thoracic Surgery Research Laboratories, Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Janusz PawliszynDepartment of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 190953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The techniques currently used for drug, metabolite, and biomarker determination are based on sample collection, and therefore they are not suitable for repeated analysis because of the high invasiveness. Here, we present a novel method of biochemical analysis directly in organ during operation without need of a separate sample collection step: solid-phase microextraction (SPME). The approach is based on flexible microprobe coated with biocompatible extraction phase that is inserted to the tissue with no damage or disturbance of the organ. The method was evaluated during lung and liver transplantations using normothermic ex vivo liver perfusion (NEVLP) and ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP). The study demonstrated feasibility of the method to extract wide range of endogenous compounds and drugs. Statistical analysis allowed observing metabolic changes of lung during cold ischemic time, perfusion, and reperfusion. It was also demonstrated that the level of drugs and their metabolites can be monitored over time. Based on the methylprednisolone as a selected example, the impairment of enzymatic properties of liver was detected in the injured organs but not in healthy control. This finding was supported by changes in pathways of endogenous metabolites. The SPME probe was also used for analysis of perfusion fluid using stopcock connection. The evaluation of biochemical profile of perfusates demonstrated potential of the approach for monitoring organ function during ex vivo perfusion. The simplicity of the device makes it convenient to use by medical personnel. With the microprobe, different areas of the organ or various organs can be sampled simultaneously. The technology allows assessment of organ function by biochemical profiling, determination of potential biomarkers, and drug monitoring. The use of this method for preintervention analysis could enhance the decision-making process for the best possible personalized approach, whereas post-transplantation monitoring would be used for graft assessments and fast response in case of organ failure.

Indexed as

Solid Phase MicroextractionAnimalsBiomarkersIntraoperative PeriodMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicPharmaceutical PreparationsSwineBiomarkersPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.