Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24686414›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2014

A brief history of synthetic biology.

D Ewen Cameron, Caleb J Bashor, James J Collins

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 325 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
325citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

325 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. PlantGFM: A Genomic Foundation Model for Discovery and Creation of Plant Genes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

265 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

D Ewen Cameron1] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Center of Synthetic Biology and the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [3].
Caleb J Bashor1] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Center of Synthetic Biology and the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [3].
James J Collins1] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Center of Synthetic Biology and the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

HHMI
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to rationally engineer microorganisms has been a long-envisioned goal dating back more than a half-century. With the genomics revolution and rise of systems biology in the 1990s came the development of a rigorous engineering discipline to create, control and programme cellular behaviour. The resulting field, known as synthetic biology, has undergone dramatic growth throughout the past decade and is poised to transform biotechnology and medicine. This Timeline article charts the technological and cultural lifetime of synthetic biology, with an emphasis on key breakthroughs and future challenges.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyGenetic EngineeringHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturySynthetic BiologySystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID24686414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.