Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24685165›Full record

ArticleJournal of chromatography. A2014

Optimised concentration and purification of retroviruses using membrane chromatography.

D J McNally, D Darling, F Farzaneh, P R Levison, N K H Slater

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chromatography. A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent development and application of membrane chromatography.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Lentiviral Vector Purification Using Nanofiber Ion-Exchange Chromatography.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Gene Therapy.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D J McNallyDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, New Museums Site, Pembroke St, Cambridge CB2 3RA, UK. Electronic address: dmcnally@cantab.net.
D DarlingKing's College London, 123 Coldharbour Lane, London SE5 9NU, UK.
F FarzanehKing's College London, 123 Coldharbour Lane, London SE5 9NU, UK.
P R LevisonPall Europe Limited, 5 Harbourgate Business Park, Southampton Road, Portsmouth PO6 4BQ, Hampshire, UK.
N K H SlaterDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, New Museums Site, Pembroke St, Cambridge CB2 3RA, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E005896/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of an anion exchange membrane to purify a γ-retrovirus was assessed and optimised with respect to different loading and wash buffers. Recoveries of infectious virus greater than 50% were consistently obtained, while specific titre was increased up to one thousand fold when compared to the material loaded. Specific proteins removed and retained by this optimised process were identified by mass spectrometry. It was possible to successfully bind and elute the equivalent of 1.27 × 10(8) Ifu/ml of ion exchange membrane. This could then be highly concentrated, with infectious virus concentrated to a maximum of 420-fold compared to the load.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineChromatography, Ion ExchangeGenetic VectorsLeukemia Virus, MurineRetroviridaeViral ProteinsViral ProteinsChromatographyGene therapyMembrane adsorptionRetrovirusVirus

Identifiers

PMID24685165
PMCPMC4003387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.