Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24684925›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2014

Evaluation of a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assay for the detection of respiratory pathogens in oncological patients.

Lucia Berning, Stephan W Aberle, Benedikt Simon, Christoph Luger, Petra Apfalter, Sigrid Machherndl-Spandl, Heidrun Kerschner

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lucia Berninganalyse BioLab, Elisabethinen Hospital Linz, Eisenhandstrasse 4-6, 4020 Linz, Austria.
Stephan W AberleDepartment of Virology, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1095 Vienna, Austria.
Benedikt SimonDepartment of Virology, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1095 Vienna, Austria.
Christoph Lugeranalyse BioLab, Elisabethinen Hospital Linz, Eisenhandstrasse 4-6, 4020 Linz, Austria.
Petra Apfalteranalyse BioLab, Elisabethinen Hospital Linz, Eisenhandstrasse 4-6, 4020 Linz, Austria.
Sigrid Machherndl-Spandl1st Internal Department - Hematology with Stem Cell Transplantation, Hemostaseology and Medical Oncology, Elisabethinen Hospital Linz, Fadingerstrasse 1, 4020 Linz, Austria.
Heidrun Kerschneranalyse BioLab, Elisabethinen Hospital Linz, Eisenhandstrasse 4-6, 4020 Linz, Austria. Electronic address: heidrun.kerschner@analyse.eu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRespiratory tract infections are widespread and may cause significant morbidity and mortality in immunosuppressed populations such as oncological patients.

objectivesThe RealAccurate Respiratory RT PCR Kit covering 14 respiratory viruses was compared to the RespiFinder Smart22, a broad-spectrum multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) test, targeting 22 viral and bacterial respiratory pathogens. STUDY

designAfter verification of its analytical performance, the clinical performance of the RespiFinder Smart22 was evaluated by re-analysis of 96 respiratory samples from oncological patients. Additionally, the time to result (TTR) of both methods was compared.

resultsThe analytical performance of the RespiFinder Smart22 fulfilled all previously specified criteria. Concordant results in both assays were achieved in 74.0% of all clinical specimens and in 91.2% when only positive results were taken into account. The RespiFinder Smart22 yielded additional results in a total of 22 (22.9% of 96) samples due to higher test sensitivity and a broader, highly multiplexed spectrum of pathogens. The TTR of a typical routine test consisting of three samples were 206 and 356 min for the RealAccurate Respiratory RT PCR Kit and the RespiFinder Smart22, respectively. However, hands-on time was reduced by 59.0% applying the MLPA method.

conclusionsIn our hands, the RespiFinder Smart22 showed excellent analytical performance while hands-on time was halved in comparison to the RT PCR method. Regarding the clinical evaluation, the MLPA method provided additional results in 22.9% (22/96) of specimens due to its comprehensive format, higher test sensitivity and the capability to detect 22 pathogens compared to 14 with the RealAccurate Respiratory RT PCR Kit.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBacteriaBacterial InfectionsFemaleHumansImmunocompromised HostMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionNeoplasmsRespiratory Tract InfectionsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityHands on timeMLPAMultiplex detectionOncologyRespiratory tract infectionTime to result

Identifiers

PMID24684925
PMCPMC7106480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.