Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24684350›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of haematology2014

SOX11 and TP53 add prognostic information to MIPI in a homogenously treated cohort of mantle cell lymphoma--a Nordic Lymphoma Group study.

Lena Nordström, Sandra Sernbo, Patrik Eden, Kirsten Grønbaek, Arne Kolstad, Riikka Räty, Marja-Liisa Karjalainen, Christian Geisler, Elisabeth Ralfkiaer, Christer Sundström and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of haematology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Haematologica · 2020
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Your chemo is no good here: management of high-risk MCL.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Hematopoietic cell transplantation for mantle cell lymphoma.International journal of hematology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Lena NordströmDepartment of Immunotechnology, CREATE Health, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Sandra Sernbo
Patrik Eden
Kirsten Grønbaek
Arne Kolstad
Riikka Räty
Marja-Liisa Karjalainen
Christian Geisler
Elisabeth Ralfkiaer
Christer Sundström
Anna Laurell
Jan Delabie
Mats Ehinger
Mats Jerkeman
Sara Ek
Lund University · SERigshospitalet · DKHelsinki University Hospital · FINorwegian Cancer Society · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUppsala University · SEUppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive B cell lymphoma, where survival has been remarkably improved by use of protocols including high dose cytarabine, rituximab and autologous stem cell transplantation, such as the Nordic MCL2/3 protocols. In 2008, a MCL international prognostic index (MIPI) was created to enable stratification of the clinical diverse MCL patients into three risk groups. So far, use of the MIPI in clinical routine has been limited, as it has been shown that it inadequately separates low and intermediate risk group patients. To improve outcome and minimize treatment-related morbidity, additional parameters need to be evaluated to enable risk-adapted treatment selection. We have investigated the individual prognostic role of the MIPI and molecular markers including SOX11, TP53 (p53), MKI67 (Ki-67) and CCND1 (cyclin D1). Furthermore, we explored the possibility of creating an improved prognostic tool by combining the MIPI with information on molecular markers. SOX11 was shown to significantly add prognostic information to the MIPI, but in multivariate analysis TP53 was the only significant independent molecular marker. Based on these findings, we propose that TP53 and SOX11 should routinely be assessed and that a combined TP53/MIPI score may be used to guide treatment decisions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorChildCohort StudiesCyclin D1FemaleHumansLymphoma, Mantle-CellMaleNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSeverity of Illness IndexBiomarkers, TumorCCND1 protein, humanCyclin D1Neoplasm ProteinsSOX11 protein, humanSOXC Transcription FactorsTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53lymphoid malignanciesmolecular diagnosticsprognostic factors

Identifiers

PMID24684350
PMCPMC4282019
OpenAlexW2029940110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.