Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24683442›Full record

ArticleOnline journal of public health informatics2014

Mobile medical and health apps: state of the art, concerns, regulatory control and certification.

Maged N Kamel Boulos, Ann C Brewer, Chante Karimkhani, David B Buller, Robert P Dellavalle

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Online journal of public health informatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03249896 (Effects of a Web/Smartphone-based Lifestyle Coaching Program on Gestational Weight Gain in Pregnant Women With Gestational Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 233 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
233citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03249896 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Effects of a Web/Smartphone-based Lifestyle Coaching Program on Gestational Weight Gain in Pregnant Women With Gestational Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University Hospital, SingaporeRan2017 to 2019Enrolled340ConditionsGestational Diabetes, Pregnancy Complications, Weight GainArmsHabits-GDM mobile app
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

233 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Mobile App-Based Stress-Management Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

173 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maged N Kamel BoulosFaculty of Health & Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, UK.
Ann C BrewerDermatology Residency Program, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.
Chante KarimkhaniColumbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10032, USA.
David B BullerKlein Buendel, Inc, Golden, CO 80401, USA.
Robert P DellavalleDermatology Service, Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, CO 80220, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines the state of the art in mobile clinical and health-related apps. A 2012 estimate puts the number of health-related apps at no fewer than 40,000, as healthcare professionals and consumers continue to express concerns about the quality of many apps, calling for some form of app regulatory control or certification to be put in place. We describe the range of apps on offer as of 2013, and then present a brief survey of evaluation studies of medical and health-related apps that have been conducted to date, covering a range of clinical disciplines and topics. Our survey includes studies that highlighted risks, negative issues and worrying deficiencies in existing apps. We discuss the concept of 'apps as a medical device' and the relevant regulatory controls that apply in USA and Europe, offering examples of apps that have been formally approved using these mechanisms. We describe the online Health Apps Library run by the National Health Service in England and the calls for a vetted medical and health app store. We discuss the ingredients for successful apps beyond the rather narrow definition of 'apps as a medical device'. These ingredients cover app content quality, usability, the need to match apps to consumers' general and health literacy levels, device connectivity standards (for apps that connect to glucometers, blood pressure monitors, etc.), as well as app security and user privacy. 'Happtique Health App Certification Program' (HACP), a voluntary app certification scheme, successfully captures most of these desiderata, but is solely focused on apps targeting the US market. HACP, while very welcome, is in ways reminiscent of the early days of the Web, when many "similar" quality benchmarking tools and codes of conduct for information publishers were proposed to appraise and rate online medical and health information. It is probably impossible to rate and police every app on offer today, much like in those early days of the Web, when people quickly realised the same regarding informational Web pages. The best first line of defence was, is, and will always be to educate consumers regarding the potentially harmful content of (some) apps.

Indexed as

evaluationhealthcaremobile appsmobile health (mHealth)mobile tablet computersqualityregulation and certificationsmartphonestelemedicinetext messaging

Identifiers

PMID24683442
PMCPMC3959919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.