Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24683423›Full record

ArticleCommunications in computational physics2013

Lin Wang, Shawn Witham, Zhe Zhang, Lin Li, Michael E Hodsdon, Emil Alexov

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications in computational physics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Electrostatic features for nucleocapsid proteins of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2.Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Protonation and pK changes in protein-ligand binding.Quarterly reviews of biophysics · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lin WangComputational Biophysics and Bioinformatics, Department of Physics, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634.
Shawn WithamComputational Biophysics and Bioinformatics, Department of Physics, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634.
Zhe ZhangComputational Biophysics and Bioinformatics, Department of Physics, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634.
Lin LiComputational Biophysics and Bioinformatics, Department of Physics, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634.
Michael E HodsdonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and the Department of Pharmacology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520.
Emil AlexovComputational Biophysics and Bioinformatics, Department of Physics, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634.
Clemson University · USYale University · US

Funding

New Generation DelPhi: large systems and beyond electrostaticsR01GM093937 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI ALEXOV, EMIL GEORGIEV · 2010 to 2023
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental data shows that the binding of human prolactin (hPRL) to human prolactin receptor (hPRLr-ECD) is strongly pH-dependent, while the binding of the same receptor to human growth hormone (hGH) is pH-independent. Here we carry

Indexed as

electrostaticshuman growth hormonehuman prolactinhuman prolactin receptorpH-dependencepKa calculations

Identifiers

PMID24683423
PMCPMC3966486
OpenAlexW2152324774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.