Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24683043›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2014

Lay navigator model for impacting cancer health disparities.

Cathy D Meade, Kristen J Wells, Mariana Arevalo, Ercilia R Calcano, Marlene Rivera, Yolanda Sarmiento, Harold P Freeman, Richard G Roetzheim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The Effectiveness ofCancers · 2025
    Article
  3. Exploring the Role of Peer Health Navigators in the Australian Health System: A Qualitative Interview Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Relationship between using cancer resource center services and patient outcomes.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Coordination Models for Cancer Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Marginalized patient identities and the patient-physician relationship in the cancer care context: a systematic scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  14. AHealth promotion practice · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Patient navigation for complex care patients in the emergency department: a survey of oncology patient navigators.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cathy D MeadeDivision of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Fow-Edu, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA, cathy.meade@moffitt.org.
Kristen J Wells
Mariana Arevalo
Ercilia R Calcano
Marlene Rivera
Yolanda Sarmiento
Harold P Freeman
Richard G Roetzheim

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI John L. Cleveland · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
Patient Navigator ProgramU01CA117281 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR &RES INST · PI ROETZHEIM, RICHARD G · 2005 to 2009
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS 5 U01 CA 117281NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS U01 CA117281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper recounts experiences, challenges, and lessons learned when implementing a lay patient navigator program to improve cancer care among medically underserved patients who presented in a primary care clinic with a breast or colorectal cancer abnormality. The program employed five lay navigators to navigate 588 patients. Central programmatic elements were the following: (1) use of bilingual lay navigators with familiarity of communities they served; (2) provision of training, education, and supportive activities; (3) multidisciplinary clinical oversight that factored in caseload intensity; and (4) well-developed partnerships with community clinics and social service entities. Deconstruction of healthcare system information was fundamental to navigation processes. We conclude that a lay model of navigation is well suited to assist patients through complex healthcare systems; however, a stepped care model that includes both lay and professional navigation may be optimal to help patients across the entire continuum.

Indexed as

Models, EducationalPatient AdvocacyPatient NavigationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24683043
PMCPMC4133280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.