Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24682893›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2014

Birth defects, causal attributions, and ethnicity in the national birth defects prevention study.

Amy P Case, Marjorie Royle, Angela E Scheuerle, Suzan L Carmichael, Karen Moffitt, Tunu Ramadhani, National Birth Defects Prevention Study

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amy P CaseBirth Defects Epidemiology & Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, P.O. Box 149347, Austin, TX, 78714-9347, USA, acase@research-commons.com.
Marjorie Royle
Angela E Scheuerle
Suzan L Carmichael
Karen Moffitt
Tunu Ramadhani
National Birth Defects Prevention Study
Texas Department of State Health Services · USNew Jersey Department of Health · USStanford University · US

Funding

PHS HHS U50/CCU613232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to translate research findings into effective prevention strategies, it is important to understand people's beliefs about the causes of poor health outcomes. However, with the exception of knowledge and beliefs about folic acid supplementation, little is known regarding women's causal attributions women regarding birth defects. We employed Attribution Theory constructs to analyze open-text interview responses from 2,672 control mothers in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study who gave birth in 1997-2005. Common themes included use of alcohol, tobacco, illicit drugs, and medications during pregnancy. Stress and emotional upset were also suggested as possible causes of birth defects. Genetic- and heredity-related responses were more likely to be mentioned by Asian/Pacific Islander women compared to non-Hispanic Whites. Hispanic women were less likely to suggest several specific possible teratogens, such as paint, pesticides, or other chemicals, but were more likely to suggest events occurring during childbirth. Differences also emerged among ethnic groups for theoretical constructs, although most responses were categorized as controllable, changeable over time, and with an internal locus of causality.

Indexed as

CausalityEthnicityAdolescentAdultCongenital AbnormalitiesHumansUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24682893
OpenAlexW2081258977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.