Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24682865›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2014

Scalp eschar and neck lymphadenopathy after tick bite: an emerging syndrome with multiple causes.

G Dubourg, C Socolovschi, P Del Giudice, P E Fournier, D Raoult

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Prevalence ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Tick-Borne Bacterial Diseases in Europe: Threats to public health.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Investigating the pathogens associated withInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Epidemiology of ZoonoticMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Veterinary sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. New microbes and new infections · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The Rickettsioses: A Practical Update.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

G DubourgUnité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes (URMITE; Research Unit on Infectious and Tropical Emerging Diseases) UM 63 CNRS 7278 IRD 198 INSERM U1095, Faculty of Medicine, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
C Socolovschi
P Del Giudice
P E Fournier
D Raoult
Aix-Marseille Université · FRCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Fréjus Saint-Raphaël · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRMéditerranée Infection Foundation · FRUniversité Jean Moulin Lyon III · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical and epidemiological features of 56 patients with scalp eschar associated with neck lymphadenopathy after a tick bite (SENLAT) syndrome were evaluated at the National French Rickettsial Center. Eschar swabs, crusts, and biopsies as well as ticks and blood samples were acquired for molecular and serological assays. SENLAT predominantly affects children (p < 0.05), followed by 40- to 70-year-olds, and it is found mostly in women (p < 0.05). The seasonal distribution has two peaks: one in the spring (55%) and one in the autumn (30%). The etiological agent was identified in 18 cases, which include Rickettsia slovaca in 13 cases with incidences of two co-infections with Rickettsia raoultii and one case caused by Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae. Other possible agents that were found in attached ticks were Candidatus R. rioja, Coxiella burnetii, and Borrelia burgdorferi. The tick vector was Dermacentor marginatus in almost all cases, with the exception of one case, in which Ixodes ricinus was identified as the vector. Our findings show that SENLAT is a clinical entity characterized as a local infection controlled by the immune system and is neither pathogen- nor vector-specific.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolDermacentorFemaleHumansLymphatic DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRickettsia InfectionsScalpScalp Dermatoses

Identifiers

PMID24682865
OpenAlexW2003455089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.