Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24682821›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2014

Explaining the correlations among properties of mammalian promoters.

Martin C Frith, FANTOM consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Core Promoter Is a Regulatory Hub for Developmental Gene Expression.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martin C FrithComputational Biology Research Center, AIST, 2-4-7 Aomi, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-0064, Japan.
FANTOM consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proximal promoters are fundamental genomic elements for gene expression. They vary in terms of GC percentage, CpG abundance, presence of TATA signal, evolutionary conservation, chromosomal spread of transcription start sites and breadth of expression across cell types. These properties are correlated, and it has been suggested that there are two classes of promoters: one class with high CpG, widely spread transcription start sites and broad expression, and another with TATA signals, narrow spread and restricted expression. However, it has been unclear why these properties are correlated in this way. We reexamined these features using the deep FANTOM5 CAGE data from hundreds of cell types. First, we point out subtle but important biases in previous definitions of promoters and of expression breadth. Second, we show that most promoters are rather nonspecifically expressed across many cell types. Third, promoters' expression breadth is independent of maximum expression level, and therefore correlates with average expression level. Fourth, the data show a more complex picture than two classes, with a network of direct and indirect correlations among promoter properties. By tentatively distinguishing the direct from the indirect correlations, we reveal simple explanations for them.

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticAnimalsCpG IslandsData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansMiceTATA BoxTranscription, GeneticTranscription Initiation Site

Identifiers

PMID24682821
PMCPMC4005656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.