ArticleInternational ophthalmology2015
The change in intraocular pressure after pupillary dilation in eyes with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma, and eyes of normal subjects.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fluctuations in intraocular pressure before and after femtosecond laser pretreatment for cataract surgery.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Atropine-induced intraocular pressure changes and anterior segment structural parameters in dogs assessed by ultrasound biomicroscopy.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Intraocular pressure and gonioscopic findings in primary angle-closure disease in India-a big data study.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Effect of SCUBA Diving on Ophthalmic Parameters.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Impact of atropine use for myopia control on intraocular pressure in children: A comprehensive review including postpupil dilation intraocular pressure changes.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) after pharmacologic dilation in eyes with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG), and eyes of normal subjects. This cross-sectional study was conducted in a university hospital-based setting. Patients with PXG, POAG, and normal subjects were consecutively selected and included in the study. Of the 125 eyes of 125 subjects; 46 (25 female) had PXG, 42 (29 female) had POAG, and 37 (20 female) belonged to the control group. Pharmacologic dilation procedure consisted of instillation of topical phenylephrine HCL 10 % followed 5 min by tropicamide 1 %. Studied variables were pre- and post-dilation IOP and also baseline measurements of anterior chamber angle, central corneal thickness, and pupillary diameter by Pentacam HR (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). Clinically significant IOP change was defined as a change of ≥2 mmHg from baseline. Randomly selected single eye of each patient was included in the analysis. The mean pre:post-dilation IOP of eyes with PXG and POAG was 17.39 ± 3.89:17.54 ± 3.98 and 15.92 ± 2.37:16.07 ± 2.89 mmHg, respectively. The difference between the pre- and post-dilation IOP of eyes with PXG and POAG was not statistically significant. The eyes of control subjects, however, had a statistically significant reduction of IOP from 14.24 ± 2.88 to 13.54 ± 2.94 mmHg (P = 0.005). 28.3 % (13/46) of eyes with PXG, 16.7 % (7/42) of eyes with POAG, and 2.7 % (1/37) of control eyes showed a clinically significant IOP elevation from baseline after the dilation. In this study, glaucoma patients proportionally experienced a higher rate of clinically significant IOP elevation after pupillary dilation, when compared to normal subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.