Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24682573›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2014

Pharmacy study of natural health product adverse reactions (SONAR): a cross-sectional study using active surveillance in community pharmacies to detect adverse events associated with natural health products and assess causality.

Candace Necyk, Ross T Tsuyuki, Heather Boon, Brian C Foster, Don Legatt, George Cembrowski, Mano Murty, Joanne Barnes, Theresa L Charrois, John T Arnason and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Natural health product-drug interaction tool: A scoping review.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Patients' perceptions and use of natural health products.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Candace NecykFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Ross T Tsuyuki
Heather Boon
Brian C Foster
Don Legatt
George Cembrowski
Mano Murty
Joanne Barnes
Theresa L Charrois
John T Arnason
Mark A Ware
Rhonda J Rosychuk
Sunita Vohra
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAAlberta Health Services · CAHealth Canada · CAInnovation Research Center · USMcGill University Health Centre · CAUniversity of Alberta Hospital · CAUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the rates and causality of adverse event(s) (AE) associated with natural health product (NHP) use, prescription drug use and concurrent NHP-drug use through active surveillance in community pharmacies.

designCross-sectional study of screened patients.

setting10 community pharmacies across Alberta and British Columbia, Canada from 14 January to 30 July 2011.

participantsThe participating pharmacy staff screened consecutive patients, or agents of patients, who were dropping or picking up prescription medications. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were screened to determine the proportions of them using prescription drugs and/or NHPs, as well as their respective AE rates. All AEs reported by the screened patients who took a NHP, consented to, and were available for, a detailed telephone interview (14%) were adjudicated fully to assess for causality.

resultsOver a total of 105 pharmacy weeks and 1118 patients screened, 410 patients reported taking prescription drugs only (36.7%; 95% CI 33.9% to 39.5%), 37 reported taking NHPs only (3.3%; 95% CI 2.4% to 4.5%) and 657 reported taking prescription drugs and NHPs concurrently (58.8%; 95% CI 55.9% to 61.6%). In total, 54 patients reported an AE, representing 1.2% (95% CI 0.51% to 2.9%), 2.7% (95% CI 0.4% to 16.9%) and 7.3% (95% CI 5.6% to 9.6%) of each population, respectively. Compared with patients who reported using prescription drugs, the patients who reported using prescription drugs and NHPs concurrently were 6.4 times more likely to experience an AE (OR; 95% CI 2.52 to 16.17; p<0.001). Combined with data from Ontario, Canada, a national proportion was calculated, which found that 45.4% (95% CI 43.8% to 47.0%) of Canadians who visit community pharmacies take NHPs and prescription drugs concurrently, and of those, 7.4% (95% CI 6.3% to 8.8%) report an AE.

conclusionsA substantial proportion of community pharmacy patients use prescription drugs and NHPs concurrently; these patients are at a greater risk of experiencing an AE. Active surveillance provides a means of detecting such AEs and collecting high-quality data on which causality assessment can be based.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsPharmaciesAdolescentAdultAgedBiological ProductsBritish ColumbiaChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPharmacistsBiological ProductsPrescription DrugsComplementary MedicineToxicology

Identifiers

PMID24682573
PMCPMC3975764
OpenAlexW2078679375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.