ArticleHaematologica2014
Subcutaneous immunoglobulin in lymphoproliferative disorders and rituximab-related secondary hypogammaglobulinemia: a single-center experience in 61 patients.
Article in Haematologica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Use of 20% Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy in Patients With B Cell Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma With Humoral Immune Dysfunction After Treatment With Rituximab
A Prospective Case Series of Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin for Prophylaxis of Infections in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia With Impaired Humoral Immunity
Immunoglobulins in Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving a BCMA-Directed T Cell Engager
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of the cost and cost-effectiveness of immunoglobulin treatment in patients with hematological malignancies.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2024Pooled it
- British Society for Immunology and United Kingdom Primary Immunodeficiency Network (UKPIN) consensus guideline for the management of immunoglobulin replacement therapy.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2022Guideline
- Controversies about immunoglobulin replacement therapy in HSCT recipients with hypogammaglobulinemia.Bone marrow transplantation · 2022Pooled it
- Subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement for treatment of humoral immune dysfunction in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Quality and Safety Intervention: Improving Care of Patients Undergoing B Cell-Targeted Therapies.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap in Secondary Antibody Deficiencies: Current Evidence and Unmet Needs in Diagnosis and Management with Immunoglobulin Replacement.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Review
- Article
- Patient-reported outcomes with subcutaneous immunoglobulin in secondary immunodeficiency.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Current Approach in the Management of Secondary Immunodeficiency in Patients with Hematological Malignancies: Spanish Expert Consensus Recommendations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Should treatment of hypogammaglobulinemia with immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) become standard of care in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia?Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Article
- Subcutaneous immunoglobulins in chronic lymphocytic leukemia with secondary antibody deficiency. A monocentric experience during Covid-19 pandemics.Hematological oncology · 2022Article
- The impact of anti-CD20-based therapy on hypogammaglobulinemia in patients with follicular lymphoma.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2022Article
- Ten-year population trends of immunoglobulin use, burden of adult antibody deficiency and feasibility of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) replacement in Hong Kong Chinese.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Observational
- Secondary Immunodeficiency in Hematological Malignancies: Focus on Multiple Myeloma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Article
- Review
- Secondary immunodeficiencies with predominant antibody deficiency: multidisciplinary perspectives of Polish experts.Central-European journal of immunology · 2020Review
- Infection prevention in sarcoidosis: proposal for vaccination and prophylactic therapy.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravenous immunoglobulin replacement therapy represents the standard treatment for hypogammaglobulinemia secondary to B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin infusion is an effective, safe and well-tolerated treatment approach in primary immunodeficiencies but no extensive data are available on their use in secondary hypogammaglobulinemia, a frequent phenomenon occurring after treatment with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in lymphoproliferative disorders. In this retrospective study we evaluated efficacy (serum IgG trough levels, incidence of infections per year, need for antibiotics) and safety (number of adverse events) of intravenous (300 mg/kg/4 weeks) versus subcutaneous (75 mg/kg/week) immunoglobulin replacement therapy in 61 patients. In addition, the impact of the infusion methods on quality of life was compared. All patients were treated with subcutaneous immunoglobulin, and 33 out of them had been previously treated with intravenous immunoglobulin. Both treatments appeared to be effective in replacing Ig production deficiency and in reducing the incidence of infectious events and the need for antibiotics. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin obtained a superior benefit when compared to intravenous immunoglobulin achieving higher IgG trough levels, lower incidence of overall infection and need for antibiotics. The incidence of serious bacterial infections was similar with both infusion ways. As expected, a lower number of adverse events was registered with subcutaneous immunoglobulin, compared to intravenous immunoglobulin, with no serious adverse events. Finally, we observed an improvement in health-related quality of life parameters after the switch to subcutaneous immunoglobulin. Our results suggest that subcutaneous immunoglobulin is safe and effective in patients with hypogammaglobulinemia associated to lymphoproliferative disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.