Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24682503›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2014

Separate mechanisms for development and performance of compulsive checking in the quinpirole sensitization rat model of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

Mark C Tucci, Anna Dvorkin-Gheva, Renee Sharma, Leena Taji, Paul Cheon, John Peel, Ashley Kirk, Henry Szechtman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Insights from animal models.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark C TucciDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Health Science Centre, Room 4N82, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4K1.
Anna Dvorkin-Gheva
Renee Sharma
Leena Taji
Paul Cheon
John Peel
Ashley Kirk
Henry Szechtman
McMaster University · CAMcMaster University Medical Centre · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-64424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleAcute administration of serotonergic agonist, meta-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP), attenuates performance of compulsive checking in an animal model of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). It is not known whether mCPP has a similar effect on development of compulsive checking.

objectivesThe objective of the study was to examine whether similar mechanisms mediate the development versus the performance of compulsive checking in the rat model.

methodsFour groups of male rats (N = 14/group) were tested: two experimental groups co-injected with D2/D3 dopamine agonist quinpirole (0.25 mg/kg) and mCPP (0.625 mg/kg or 1.25 mg/kg), and two control groups, one co-injected with quinpirole and saline, the other receiving injections of saline. The time course of development of compulsive checking across injections 1 to 10 in quinpirole-treated rats was compared to rats co-injected with quinpirole and mCPP.

resultsResults showed that during the course of chronic treatment, mCPP (1.25 mg/kg) significantly attenuated performance of checking behavior. However, when these rats were retested for expression of compulsive checking (that is, with an injection of quinpirole only), their profile of compulsive checking was no different from the control rats treated throughout with quinpirole only.

conclusionsFindings show that mCPP inhibits performance of compulsive checking but does not block quinpirole from inducing the neural substrate underlying this compulsive behavior. Hence, a separate mechanism underlies the induction of compulsive checking and the performance of it. It is suggested that development of the OCD endophenotype reflects neuroplastic changes produced by repeated dopamine D2/D3 receptor stimulation, while stimulation of serotonergic receptors mediates a negative feedback signal that shuts down the motor performance of checking.

Indexed as

AnimalsCompulsive BehaviorDisease Models, AnimalMaleObsessive-Compulsive DisorderPiperazinesQuinpiroleRatsRats, Long-EvansReceptors, Dopamine D3Serotonin Receptor Agonists1-(3-chlorophenyl)piperazinePiperazinesQuinpiroleReceptors, Dopamine D3Serotonin Receptor Agonists

Identifiers

PMID24682503
OpenAlexW1979567039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.