Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24682495›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Clinical research data warehouse governance for distributed research networks in the USA: a systematic review of the literature.

John H Holmes, Thomas E Elliott, Jeffrey S Brown, Marsha A Raebel, Arthur Davidson, Andrew F Nelson, Annie Chung, Pierre La Chance, John F Steiner

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Clinical Research Informatics: a Decade-in-Review.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. National health information technology priorities for research: A policy and development agenda.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A dimensional warehouse for integrating operational data from clinical trials.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

John H HolmesCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Thomas E ElliottUniversity of Minnesota Medical School, HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Jeffrey S BrownHarvard Medical School Department of Population Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Marsha A RaebelKaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Arthur DavidsonDenver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Andrew F NelsonHealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Annie ChungCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Pierre La ChanceResearch Informatics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon, USA.
John F SteinerKaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA.

Funding

Scalable PArtnering Network for CER: Across Lifespan, Conditions, and SettingsR01HS019912 · AHRQ · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DALEY, MATTHEW FREDRICK · 2010 to 2010
$8.3M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS019912AHRQ HHS R01HS019912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the published, peer-reviewed literature on clinical research data warehouse governance in distributed research networks (DRNs). MATERIALS AND

methodsMedline, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and INSPEC were searched for relevant documents published through July 31, 2013 using a systematic approach. Only documents relating to DRNs in the USA were included. Documents were analyzed using a classification framework consisting of 10 facets to identify themes.

results6641 documents were retrieved. After screening for duplicates and relevance, 38 were included in the final review. A peer-reviewed literature on data warehouse governance is emerging, but is still sparse. Peer-reviewed publications on UK research network governance were more prevalent, although not reviewed for this analysis. All 10 classification facets were used, with some documents falling into two or more classifications. No document addressed costs associated with governance. DISCUSSION: Even though DRNs are emerging as vehicles for research and public health surveillance, understanding of DRN data governance policies and procedures is limited. This is expected to change as more DRN projects disseminate their governance approaches as publicly available toolkits and peer-reviewed publications.

conclusionsWhile peer-reviewed, US-based DRN data warehouse governance publications have increased, DRN developers and administrators are encouraged to publish information about these programs.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchComputer Communication NetworksComputer SecurityConfidentialityDatabases as TopicPrivacyUnited StatesClinical researchData governanceData privacyData warehouseResearch networks

Identifiers

PMID24682495
PMCPMC4078282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.