Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24682463›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2014

Eribulin monotherapy in patients aged 70 years and older with metastatic breast cancer.

Hyman Muss, Javier Cortes, Linda T Vahdat, Fatima Cardoso, Chris Twelves, Jantien Wanders, Corina E Dutcus, Jay Yang, Seth Seegobin, Joyce O'Shaughnessy

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Time-to-Treatment-Failure and Related Outcomes Among 1000+ Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Comparisons Between Older Versus Younger Patients (Alliance A151711).Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2018
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Eribulin for heavily pre-treated metastatic breast cancer patients.World journal of experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
  16. Eribulin in Cancer Treatment.Marine drugs · 2015
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Hyman MussUniversity of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA; Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; University of Leeds and St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, UK; Formerly of Eisai Ltd, Hatfield, UK; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey, USA; NJS Associates Company, Somerset, New Jersey USA; Baylor-Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, and US Oncology, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Javier Cortes
Linda T Vahdat
Fatima Cardoso
Chris Twelves
Jantien Wanders
Corina E Dutcus
Jay Yang
Seth Seegobin
Joyce O'Shaughnessy
Eisai (United Kingdom) · GBCornell University · USEisai (United States) · USInstitut Jules Bordet · BESt James's University Hospital · GBTexas Oncology · USUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFollowing the demonstrated efficacy and safety of eribulin mesylate in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer, an exploratory analysis was performed to investigate the effect of age in these patients.

methodsData were pooled from two single-arm phase II studies and one open-label randomized phase III study in which patients received eribulin mesylate at 1.4 mg/m(2) as 2- to 5-minute intravenous infusions on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The effect of age on median overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and incidence of adverse events (AEs) was calculated for four age groups (<50 years, 50-59 years, 60-69 years, ≥ 70 years). RESULTS. Overall, 827 patients were included in the analysis (<50 years, n = 253; 50-59 years, n = 289; 60-69 years, n = 206; ≥ 70 years, n = 79). Age had no significant impact on OS (11.8 months, 12.3 months, 11.7 months, and 12.5 months, respectively; p = .82), PFS (3.5 months, 2.9 months, 3.8 months, and 4.0 months, respectively; p = .42), ORR (12.7%, 12.5%, 6.3%, and 10.1%, respectively), or CBR (20.2%, 20.8%, 20.4%, and 21.5%, respectively). Although some AEs had higher incidence in either the youngest or the oldest subgroup, there was no overall effect of age on the incidence of AEs (including neuropathy, neutropenia, and leukopenia).

conclusionEribulin monotherapy in these selected older patients with good baseline performance status led to OS, PFS, ORR, CBR, and tolerability similar to those of younger patients with metastatic breast cancer. The benefits and risks of eribulin appear to be similar across age groups.

Indexed as

AgingAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFuransHumansKetonesMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPolyether PolyketidesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentseribulinFuransKetonesPolyether PolyketidesAgeChemotherapyEribulin mesylateMetastatic breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID24682463
PMCPMC3983814
OpenAlexW2125666438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.