Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24682379›Full record

SynthesisDiabetologia2014

Efficacy of vildagliptin versus sulfonylureas as add-on therapy to metformin: comparison of results from randomised controlled and observational studies.

Bo Ahrén, Chantal Mathieu, Giovanni Bader, Anja Schweizer, James E Foley

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Diabetologia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Efficacy of Vildagliptin Added to Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) in Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Austrian Experience with Lixisenatide Under Real-Life Conditions: A Prospective Observational Study.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Slope of change in HbAEndocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Routine use of continuous glucose monitoring in 10 501 people with diabetes mellitus.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Bo AhrénLund University, Lund, Sweden.
Chantal Mathieu
Giovanni Bader
Anja Schweizer
James E Foley
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHKU Leuven · BELund University · SENovartis (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisRandomised control trials (RCTs) do not always reflect real-life outcomes for glucose-lowering drugs. In this work we compared RCT and real-life data on the efficacy of the dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-4) inhibitor vildagliptin or sulfonylureas when added to metformin.

methodsData were pooled from five RCTs examining vildagliptin (n = 2,788) and sulfonylureas (glimepiride [n = 1,259] or gliclazide [n = 433]), added to metformin. For real-life conditions, data were extracted from an observational study examining vildagliptin (n = 7,002) or sulfonylureas (n = 3,702), added to metformin monotherapy. Linear regression analyses were performed between the baseline HbA1c and the change in HbA1c (Δ HbA1c) after 24 weeks.

resultsBaseline HbA1c correlated to Δ HbA1c (r (2) = 0.36, slope = -0.54 [95% CI -0.55, -0.53; p < 0.0001]) for both treatments. With sulfonylureas, the slope of the correlation was steeper in the observational study than in RCTs (interaction coefficient = -0.327, p < 0.001), whereas for vildagliptin, the slope was virtually identical in the observational study and the RCTs (interaction coefficient = 0.024, p = 0.175). For any given baseline HbA1c, Δ HbA1c with sulfonylureas was smaller in real life than in RCTs, whereas Δ HbA1c with vildagliptin was the same. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATIONS: When comparing RCT to real-life data, the decrease in HbA1c from baseline with sulfonylurea treatment is smaller in real life than in RCTs, whereas the reduction with vildagliptin is essentially the same, suggesting that the full power of treatment is retained in real life for vildagliptin but not for sulfonylureas, possibly due to fear of hypoglycaemia.

Indexed as

AdamantaneHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminNitrilesPyrrolidinesSulfonylurea CompoundsAdultAgedBlood GlucoseDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdamantaneBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminNitrilesPyrrolidinesSulfonylurea CompoundsVildagliptin

Identifiers

PMID24682379
OpenAlexW2071652229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.