ArticleJAMA2014
Validation of the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease Pooled Cohort risk equations.
Article in JAMA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07502703 (Validation of Remote Photoplethysmography), which is not on this map. Cited by 314 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Validation of Remote Photoplethysmography (rPPG)-Derived Cardiovascular Parameters Against Standard Clinical Measurements and Risk Scores in a Community-Based Population in Semanan, Jakarta
Who cites it
314 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 610 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploratory Cardiovascular Risk Modeling of Orforglipron Using the PREVENT Equations Compared with the Pooled Cohort Equations: A Post-Hoc Analysis from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2019Guideline
- Using PREVENT Equations to Compare Intensive vs Standard Systolic Blood Pressure Control for Primary Prevention in SPRINT.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025Trial
- Performance of the pooled cohort equations and D:A:D risk scores among individuals with HIV in a global cardiovascular disease prevention trial: a cohort study leveraging data from REPRIEVE.The lancet. HIV · 2025Trial
- Heterogeneous Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Non-Sleepy Obstructive Sleep Apnea on Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes:Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Clinical outcomes by atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score and blood pressure level in high risk individuals with type 2 diabetes.Journal of human hypertension · 2023Trial
- Effects of Diet on 10-Year Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk (from the DASH Trial).The American journal of cardiology · 2023Trial
- Statin use and outcome risks according to predicted CVD risk in Korea: A retrospective cohort study.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Comparison of Frequency of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Events Among Primary and Secondary Prevention Subgroups of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.The American journal of cardiology · 2019Trial
- Real-world impact of coronary artery calcium scoring on primary prevention management in a community cardiology practice.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- A multicentre evaluation of cardiovascular risk prediction tools in people living with HIV across England (ECARTH study).HIV medicine · 2026Observational
- Comparison of ASCVD Risk Prediction Models in STEMI: Insights From a South Asian Cohort.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
- Predictive modeling and clinical decision tools for risk stratification in steatotic liver disease.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Review
- Racialized Heteroscedasticity in Neuroimaging Features, Behavior Measures, and Neuroimaging-Based Predictive Models.Research square · 2026Article
- Gaps in lipid screening and statin use among uninsured patients in a charitable community clinic.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiovascular Disease Prediction Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Validation Studies.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Validation and Recalibration of PCE, China-PAR, and PREVENT Models for Estimating ASCVD Risk in China.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
- The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics study: Design and analytic framework for assessing the impact of genome-informed risk assessments.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
254 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceThe American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Pooled Cohort risk equations were developed to estimate atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and guide statin initiation.
objectiveTo assess calibration and discrimination of the Pooled Cohort risk equations in a contemporary US population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsAdults aged 45 to 79 years enrolled in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study between January 2003 and October 2007 and followed up through December 2010. We studied participants for whom atherosclerotic CVD risk may trigger a discussion of statin initiation (those without clinical atherosclerotic CVD or diabetes, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level between 70 and 189 mg/dL, and not taking statins; n = 10,997). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Predicted risk and observed adjudicated atherosclerotic CVD incidence (nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease [CHD] death, nonfatal or fatal stroke) at 5 years because REGARDS participants have not been followed up for 10 years. Additional analyses, limited to Medicare beneficiaries (n = 3333), added atherosclerotic CVD events identified in Medicare claims data.
resultsThere were 338 adjudicated events (192 CHD events, 146 strokes). The observed and predicted 5-year atherosclerotic CVD incidence per 1000 person-years for participants with a 10-year predicted atherosclerotic CVD risk of less than 5% was 1.9 (95% CI, 1.3-2.7) and 1.9, respectively, risk of 5% to less than 7.5% was 4.8 (95% CI, 3.4-6.7) and 4.8, risk of 7.5% to less than 10% was 6.1 (95% CI, 4.4-8.6) and 6.9, and risk of 10% or greater was 12.0 (95% CI, 10.6-13.6) and 15.1 (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 = 19.9, P = .01). The C index was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.70-0.75). There were 234 atherosclerotic CVD events (120 CHD events, 114 strokes) among Medicare-linked participants and the observed and predicted 5-year atherosclerotic CVD incidence per 1000 person-years for participants with a predicted risk of less than 7.5% was 5.3 (95% CI, 2.8-10.1) and 4.0, respectively, risk of 7.5% to less than 10% was 7.9 (95% CI, 4.6-13.5) and 6.4, and risk of 10% or greater was 17.4 (95% CI, 15.3-19.8) and 16.4 (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 = 5.4, P = .71). The C index was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.64-0.71). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort of US adults for whom statin initiation is considered based on the ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort risk equations, observed and predicted 5-year atherosclerotic CVD risks were similar, indicating that these risk equations were well calibrated in the population for which they were designed to be used, and demonstrated moderate to good discrimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.