Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24681485›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2014

Evolving models for peroxisome biogenesis.

Ewald H Hettema, Ralf Erdmann, Ida van der Klei, Marten Veenhuis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Organelle contact sites in cancer cells.Cell death & disease · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Peroxisomes : novel findings and future directions.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Peroxisome protein import recapitulated inThe Journal of cell biology · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The peroxisome: an update on mysteries 2.0.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Unloosing the Gordian knot of peroxisome formation.Current opinion in cell biology · 2018
    Review
  18. Gasdermins: Effectors of Pyroptosis.Trends in cell biology · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ewald H HettemaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK. Electronic address: e.hettema@sheffield.ac.uk.
Ralf ErdmannSystem Biochie, Ruhr Universitat Bochum, Universitatstr. 150, D-44780, Bochum, Germany.
Ida van der KleiMolecular Cell Biology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology institute, University of Groningen, 11 103, 9700CC, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marten VeenhuisMolecular Cell Biology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology institute, University of Groningen, 11 103, 9700CC, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT084265MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant progress has been made towards our understanding of the mechanism of peroxisome formation, in particular concerning sorting of peroxisomal membrane proteins, matrix protein import and organelle multiplication. Here we evaluate the progress made in recent years. We focus mainly on progress made in yeasts. We indicate the gaps in our knowledge and discuss conflicting models.

Indexed as

AnimalsEndoplasmic ReticulumHumansModels, BiologicalPeroxisomesProtein BiosynthesisProteinsProtein TransportProteins

Identifiers

PMID24681485
PMCPMC4148619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.