Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24681310›Full record

ReviewMitochondrion2014

Minireview: DNA replication in plant mitochondria.

John D Cupp, Brent L Nielsen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mitochondrion, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John D CuppDepartment of Microbiology & Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States. Electronic address: john.cupp@usu.edu.
Brent L NielsenDepartment of Microbiology & Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States. Electronic address: brentnielsen@byu.edu.

Funding

Mitochondrial DNA Recombination Proteins in ArabidopsisR15GM066787 · NIGMS · BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY · PI NIELSEN, BRENT L · 2003 to 2005
$359k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM066787NIGMS NIH HHS R15GM066787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Higher plant mitochondrial genomes exhibit much greater structural complexity compared to most other organisms. Unlike well-characterized metazoan mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) replication, an understanding of the mechanism(s) and proteins involved in plant mtDNA replication remains unclear. Several plant mtDNA replication proteins, including DNA polymerases, DNA primase/helicase, and accessory proteins have been identified. Mitochondrial dynamics, genome structure, and the complexity of dual-targeted and dual-function proteins that provide at least partial redundancy suggest that plants have a unique model for maintaining and replicating mtDNA when compared to the replication mechanism utilized by most metazoan organisms.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationMitochondriaMitochondrial ProteinsPlant ProteinsPlantsMitochondrial ProteinsPlant ProteinsMtDNA polymeraseMtDNA replicationPlant mitochondrial genomePlant mtDNA recombinationTwinkle primase/helicase

Identifiers

PMID24681310
PMCPMC4177014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.