Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24681229›Full record

ArticleVaccine2014

Antigen sparing and enhanced protection using a novel rOv-ASP-1 adjuvant in aqueous formulation with influenza vaccines.

Jiu Jiang, Erin M Fisher, Scott E Hensley, Sara Lustigman, Donna M Murasko, Hao Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Expert review of vaccines · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A life without worms.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jiu JiangDepartment of Biology, Drexel University, 3245 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; DMX Inc., West Chester, PA 19382, USA.
Erin M FisherDepartment of Biology, Drexel University, 3245 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Scott E HensleyThe Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Sara LustigmanLindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Donna M MuraskoDepartment of Biology, Drexel University, 3245 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: donna.murasko@drexel.edu.
Hao ShenDepartment of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3610 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: hshen@mail.med.upenn.edu.
Drexel University · USNew York Blood Center · USThe Wistar Institute · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Novel Protein Adjuvant for Flu VaccinesR43AI085783 · NIAID · DMX, INC. · PI JIANG, JIU · 2010 to 2011
$600k
Novel Formulation of Flu Vaccine for the AgedR43AG042993 · NIA · DMX, INC. · PI JIANG, JIU · 2012 to 2012
$299k
NIAID NIH HHS R43 AI085783NIAID NIH HHS R43AI085783NIA NIH HHS R43 AG042993NIA NIH HHS R43AG042993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influenza is one of the most common infectious diseases endangering the health of humans, especially young children and the elderly. Although vaccination is the most effective means of protection against influenza, frequent mutations in viral surface antigens, low protective efficacy of the influenza vaccine in the elderly, slow production process and the potential of vaccine supply shortage during a pandemic are significant limitations of current vaccines. Adjuvants have been used to enhance the efficacy of a variety of vaccines; however, no adjuvant is included in current influenza vaccines approved in the United States. In this study, we found that a novel adjuvant, rOv-ASP-1, co-administrated with inactivated influenza vaccine using an aqueous formulation, substantially improved the influenza-specific antibody response and protection against lethal infection in a mouse model. rOv-ASP-1 enhanced the magnitude of the specific antibody response after immunization with low doses of influenza vaccine, allowing antigen-sparring by 10-fold. The rOv-ASP-1 formulated vaccine induced a more rapid response and a stronger Th1-associated antibody response compared to vaccine alone and to the vaccine formulated with the adjuvant alum. Importantly, rOv-ASP-1 significantly enhanced cross-reactive antibody responses and protection against challenge with an antigenically distinct strain. These results demonstrate that rOv-ASP-1 is an effective adjuvant that: (1) accelerates and enhances the specific antibody response induced by influenza vaccine; (2) allows for antigen sparing; and (3) augments a Th1-biased and cross-reactive antibody response that confers protection against an antigenically distinct strain.

Indexed as

Antibody FormationAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsAntibodies, ViralAntigens, HelminthCross ReactionsFemaleHelminth ProteinsImmunoglobulin GInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza VaccinesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsTh1 CellsVaccines, InactivatedAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibodies, ViralAntigens, HelminthfluarixHelminth ProteinsImmunoglobulin GInfluenza VaccinesOv-ASP-1 protein, Onchocerca volvulusVaccines, InactivatedAdjuvantInfluenzaVaccineVirus

Identifiers

PMID24681229
PMCPMC4080630
OpenAlexW2033853551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.