Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24680455›Full record

ArticleUrology2014

Assessing the burden of complications after surgery for clinically localized kidney cancer by age and comorbidity status.

Jeffrey J Tomaszewski, Robert G Uzzo, Alexander Kutikov, Katie Hrebinko, Reza Mehrazin, Anthony Corcoran, Serge Ginzburg, Rosalia Viterbo, David Y T Chen, Richard E Greenberg and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The role of comorbidity assessment in guiding treatment decision-making for women with early breast cancer: a systematic literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Presurgical assessments].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2019
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Renal Cancer in the Elderly.Current urology reports · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey J TomaszewskiDivision of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: jeffrey.tomaszewski@fccc.edu.
Robert G UzzoDivision of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Alexander KutikovDivision of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Katie HrebinkoDivision of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Reza MehrazinDivision of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Anthony CorcoranDivision of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Serge GinzburgDivision of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Rosalia ViterboDivision of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
David Y T ChenDivision of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Richard E GreenbergDivision of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Marc C SmaldoneDivision of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Temple University · USFox Chase Cancer Center · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the association between high-risk patient status (age >75 years or Charlson comorbidity index count >2) and postoperative complications in patients undergoing surgical management for clinically localized renal tumors. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients undergoing radical nephrectomy (RN) or partial nephrectomy (PN) (2005-2012) for localized renal cell carcinoma were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to test the association between high-risk status and postoperative complications adjusting for patient, tumor, and operative characteristics.

resultsOf 1092 patients undergoing PN (71.9%) or RN (28.1%) for clinically localized renal tumors, 255 (23.4%) were classified as high risk, and 175 patients (16%) developed at least 1 complication (mean 1.6 ± 1.0). Of note, 22.4% and 14.1% of high- and low-risk patients developed a complication, respectively (P = .002). Comparing high- and low-risk patients, significant differences in Clavien I-II (20.4% vs 11.1%; P <.001) and medical (16.1% vs 8.1%, P <.001) complications were observed, whereas no differences were seen in Clavien III-V or surgical complications. No differences in complications were observed comparing patients treated with RN and PN, albeit high-risk patients were more likely to undergo RN (35.3% vs 25.9%, P = .04). After adjustment, the odds of incurring any complication were 1.9 times higher in high- compared with low-risk patients (odds ratio 1.9 [confidence interval 1.3-2.8]).

conclusionRegardless of surgical type, patients deemed high risk by age and comorbidity criteria were more likely to incur a postoperative complication after renal mass resection. Improved understanding of surgical risks in the elderly and infirmed will help better inform patients deciding between active surveillance and resection of renal tumors.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCarcinoma, Renal CellComorbidityFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNephrectomyOdds RatioPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID24680455
PMCPMC3972626
OpenAlexW2154156474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.