Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24679634›Full record

ReviewJournal of the International AIDS Society2014

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis for people who inject drugs: a review of current results and an agenda for future research.

Daniel J Escudero, Mark N Lurie, Thomas Kerr, Chanelle J Howe, Brandon D L Marshall

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Medical Providers and Harm Reduction Views on Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention Among People Who Inject Drugs.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel J EscuderoDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Mark N LurieDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Thomas KerrUrban Health Research Initiative, British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Chanelle J HoweDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Brandon D L MarshallDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; brandon_marshall@brown.edu.
Brown University · USUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Translational ScienceP30AI042853 · NIAID · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI CURT G BECKWITH · 1998 to 2026
$51.7M
Spatial Analysis CoreR24HD041020 · NICHD · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI FOSTER, ANDREW D. · 2001 to 2016
$7.4M
Impact of Antiretroviral Therapy on HIV Epidemic DynamicsR01MH083539 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI LURIE, MARK NATHAN · 2009 to 2012
$2.2M
Using Information to Align Services and Link and Retain Men in the HIV CascadeR01MH106600 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN · PI COLVIN, CHRISTOPHER JAMES, LURIE, MARK NATHAN · 2015 to 2019
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI042853NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041020NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083539NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH083539NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStudies examining the use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV transmission among people who inject drugs (PWIDs) have not been adequately summarized. Recently, the Bangkok Tenofovir Study has shown that PrEP may be effective at reducing new HIV infections among this high-risk group. This randomized controlled trial was the first study to specifically examine the efficacy of PrEP among PWIDs. In this review, we present the current state of evidence regarding the use of PrEP to prevent HIV infection in PWID populations, and set an agenda for future research to inform the most effective implementation of PrEP in the context of existing evidence-based HIV prevention strategies. DISCUSSION: Despite positive trial results confirming that PrEP may prevent HIV transmission among PWIDs, there remain many questions regarding the interpretation of these results, as well as obstacles to the implementation of PrEP regimens within highly diverse drug-using communities. Aside from the Bangkok Tenofovir Study, we identified only one other published study that has collected empirical data to inform the use of PrEP among PWIDs. The large gap in research regarding the use and implementation of PrEP for PWIDs signals the need for further research and attention.

conclusionsWe recommend that future research efforts focus on elucidating the generalizability of the Bangkok Tenofovir Study results in other injection drug-using populations, examining the willingness of PWIDs to use PrEP in diverse contexts, identifying barriers to adherence to PrEP regimens and determining the most effective ways to implement PrEP programmes within the context of existing evidence-based prevention strategies, including opioid substitution therapy and needle and syringe distribution programmes.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisAnti-HIV AgentsBiomedical ResearchForecastingHIV InfectionsHumansSubstance Abuse, IntravenousAnti-HIV AgentsHIVinjection drug usepeople who inject drugspre-exposure prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID24679634
PMCPMC3969508
OpenAlexW2086094517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.