Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24679535›Full record

ReviewCell2014

A framework for studying emotions across species.

David J Anderson, Ralph Adolphs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 316 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
316citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

316 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Systematic Review: Questionnaire-Based Measurement of Emotion Dysregulation in Children and Adolescents.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Comparative neuroanatomy of emotion expression: from flies to humans.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Exploring emotional expression in invertebrates: mechanisms, functions and phylogeny.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Tail-rattling in rodents: more than a threat display.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neural Bases of Affect-Based Impulsivity: A Decision Neuroscience Account.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

256 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David J AndersonDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA. Electronic address: wuwei@caltech.edu.
Ralph AdolphsDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA. Electronic address: radolphs@caltech.edu.

Funding

The Neurobiology of Social Decision-Making: Social Inference and ContextP50MH094258 · NIMH · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ADOLPHS, RALPH · 2012 to 2021
$18.6M
Role of the Mrg family of GPCRs in nociceptionP01NS048499 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ANDERSON, DAVID J · 2005 to 2009
$5.5M
Molecular genetic dissection of central amygdala microcircuitry underlying fear aR01MH085082 · NIMH · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ANDERSON, DAVID J · 2009 to 2019
$4.1M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIMH NIH HHS P50 MH094258NIMH NIH HHS P50MH094258NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085082NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS048499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the 19th century, there has been disagreement over the fundamental question of whether "emotions" are cause or consequence of their associated behaviors. This question of causation is most directly addressable in genetically tractable model organisms, including invertebrates such as Drosophila. Yet there is ongoing debate about whether such species even have "emotions," as emotions are typically defined with reference to human behavior and neuroanatomy. Here, we argue that emotional behaviors are a class of behaviors that express internal emotion states. These emotion states exhibit certain general functional and adaptive properties that apply across any specific human emotions like fear or anger, as well as across phylogeny. These general properties, which can be thought of as "emotion primitives," can be modeled and studied in evolutionarily distant model organisms, allowing functional dissection of their mechanistic bases and tests of their causal relationships to behavior. More generally, our approach not only aims at better integration of such studies in model organisms with studies of emotion in humans, but also suggests a revision of how emotion should be operationalized within psychology and psychiatry.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalEmotionsAnimalsBiological EvolutionBrainHumansModels, Animal

Identifiers

PMID24679535
PMCPMC4098837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.