Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24679108›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2014

Integration of substance use disorder services with primary care: health center surveys and qualitative interviews.

Darren Urada, Cheryl Teruya, Lillian Gelberg, Richard Rawson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Primary health care providers' views on managing substance use among people living with HIV.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cohort study of team-based care among marginalized people who use drugs in Ottawa.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Darren UradaLos Angeles Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, University of California, 11075 Santa Monica Blvd Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA. durada@ucla.edu.
Cheryl Teruya
Lillian Gelberg
Richard Rawson
University of California, Los Angeles · USVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEach year, nearly 20 million Americans with alcohol or illicit drug dependence do not receive treatment. The Affordable Care Act and parity laws are expected to result in increased access to treatment through integration of substance use disorder (SUD) services with primary care. However, relatively little research exists on the integration of SUD services into primary care settings. Our goal was to assess SUD service integration in California primary care settings and to identify the practice and policy facilitators and barriers encountered by providers who have attempted to integrate these services.

methodsPrimary survey and qualitative interview data were collected from the population of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in five California counties known to be engaged in SUD integration efforts was surveyed. From among the organizations that responded to the survey (78% response rate), four were purposively sampled based on their level of integration. Interviews were conducted with management, staff, and patients (n=18) from these organizations to collect further qualitative information on the barriers and facilitators of integration.

resultsCompared to mental health services, there was a trend for SUD services to be less integrated with primary care, and SUD services were rated significantly less effective. The perceived difference in effectiveness appeared to be due to provider training. Policy suggestions included expanding the SUD workforce that can bill Medicaid, allowing same-day billing of two services, facilitating easier reimbursement for medications, developing the workforce, and increasing community SUD specialty care capacity.

conclusionsEfforts to integrate SUD services with primary care face significant barriers, many of which arise at the policy level and are addressable.

Indexed as

Health Care SurveysInterviews as TopicAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCaliforniaFemaleHealth PolicyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareSubstance-Related DisordersSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID24679108
PMCPMC3978198
OpenAlexW2115067310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.