Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24679107›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2014

Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Ureaplasma species and Mycoplasma hominis in pregnant women.

Mathys J Redelinghuys, Marthie M Ehlers, Andries W Dreyer, Hennie A Lombaard, Marleen M Kock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Comparative analysis of diagnostic kits for detectingPractical laboratory medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Diagnostic challenges in postoperative pelvic infections associated withFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Prevalence ofEpidemiology and infection · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Case Report: Double trouble: a rare case of successfully treatedFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Antimicrobial Resistance in ClinicalAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  16. Spread of multidrug resistance amongAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2020
    Article
  17. An Observational Study: IsThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2020
    Article
  18. Roles ofThe world journal of men's health · 2019
    Article
  19. Prevalence of genital Mycoplasma and response to eradication treatment in patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mathys J RedelinghuysDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. shanered72@gmail.com.
Marthie M Ehlers
Andries W Dreyer
Hennie A Lombaard
Marleen M Kock

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenital mycoplasmas colonise up to 80% of sexually mature women and may invade the amniotic cavity during pregnancy and cause complications. Tetracyclines and fluoroquinolones are contraindicated in pregnancy and erythromycin is often used to treat patients. However, increasing resistance to common antimicrobial agents is widely reported. The purpose of this study was to investigate antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of genital mycoplasmas in pregnant women.

methodsSelf-collected vaginal swabs were obtained from 96 pregnant women attending an antenatal clinic in Gauteng, South Africa. Specimens were screened with the Mycofast Revolution assay for the presence of Ureaplasma species and Mycoplasma hominis. The antimicrobial susceptibility to levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, erythromycin, clindamycin and tetracycline were determined at various breakpoints. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay was used to speciate Ureaplasma positive specimens as either U. parvum or U. urealyticum.

resultsSeventy-six percent (73/96) of specimens contained Ureaplasma spp., while 39.7% (29/73) of Ureaplasma positive specimens were also positive for M. hominis. Susceptibilities of Ureaplasma spp. to levofloxacin and moxifloxacin were 59% (26/44) and 98% (43/44) respectively. Mixed isolates (Ureaplasma species and M. hominis) were highly resistant to erythromycin and tetracycline (both 97% resistance). Resistance of Ureaplasma spp. to erythromycin was 80% (35/44) and tetracycline resistance was detected in 73% (32/44) of Ureaplasma spp. Speciation indicated that U. parvum was the predominant Ureaplasma spp. conferring antimicrobial resistance.

conclusionsTreatment options for genital mycoplasma infections are becoming limited. More elaborative studies are needed to elucidate the diverse antimicrobial susceptibility patterns found in this study when compared to similar studies. To prevent complications in pregnant women, the foetus and the neonate, routine screening for the presence of genital mycoplasmas is recommended. In addition, it is recommended that antimicrobial susceptibility patterns are determined.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycoplasma hominisMycoplasmatales InfectionsPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousUreaplasmaAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID24679107
PMCPMC3976045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.