ArticleJournal of radiation oncology2014
Citation-based Estimation of Scholarly Activity Among Domestic Academic Radiation Oncologists: Five-Year Update.
Article in Journal of radiation oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender disparities in academic radiation oncology research: A narrative review.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027Review
- Assessment of h-index and associated demographic and academic parameters for academic hematologists in Canada.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Research productivity of radiation therapy physics faculty in the United States.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
- Can Sex and Seniority Predict the Quality of a Journal Reviewer's Manuscript Critique?International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021Article
- Relationship Between Scholarly Activity and Postgraduate Career Choice: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 2017 Diplomates of the American Board of Dermatology.Journal of graduate medical education · 2020Article
- Article
- Research productivity across different ophthalmic subspecialties in the United States.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Top-cited articles in medical professionalism: a bibliometric analysis versus altmetric scores.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Evaluation of the Relative Citation Ratio, a New National Institutes of Health-Supported Bibliometric Measure of Research Productivity, among Academic Radiation Oncologists.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2018Article
- Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journal.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze up-to-date Hirsch index (
methodsBibliometric citation database searches were performed for radiation oncology faculty at domestic residency-training institutions. Outcomes analyzed included the number of manuscripts, number of citations, and
resultsOne thousand thirty-seven radiation oncologists from 87 programs were included. Overall, the mean
conclusionThe current results suggest an overall rise in scholarly citation metrics among domestic academic radiation oncologists, with a current mean
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.