Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24678297›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2014

QSpike tools: a generic framework for parallel batch preprocessing of extracellular neuronal signals recorded by substrate microelectrode arrays.

Mufti Mahmud, Rocco Pulizzi, Eleni Vasilaki, Michele Giugliano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An Overview of In Vitro Biological Neural Networks for Robot Intelligence.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multidimensional Functional Profiling of Human NeuropathogenicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Deep Learning in Mining Biological Data.Cognitive computation · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Low-Impedance 3D PEDOT:PSS Ultramicroelectrodes.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mufti MahmudTheoretical Neurobiology and Neuroengineering Lab, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp Wilrijk, Belgium ; Institute of Information Technology, Jahangirnagar University Savar, Bangladesh.
Rocco PulizziTheoretical Neurobiology and Neuroengineering Lab, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp Wilrijk, Belgium.
Eleni VasilakiTheoretical Neurobiology and Neuroengineering Lab, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp Wilrijk, Belgium ; Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield Sheffield, UK.
Michele GiuglianoTheoretical Neurobiology and Neuroengineering Lab, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp Wilrijk, Belgium ; Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield Sheffield, UK ; Brain Mind Institute, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micro-Electrode Arrays (MEAs) have emerged as a mature technique to investigate brain (dys)functions in vivo and in in vitro animal models. Often referred to as "smart" Petri dishes, MEAs have demonstrated a great potential particularly for medium-throughput studies in vitro, both in academic and pharmaceutical industrial contexts. Enabling rapid comparison of ionic/pharmacological/genetic manipulations with control conditions, MEAs are employed to screen compounds by monitoring non-invasively the spontaneous and evoked neuronal electrical activity in longitudinal studies, with relatively inexpensive equipment. However, in order to acquire sufficient statistical significance, recordings last up to tens of minutes and generate large amount of raw data (e.g., 60 channels/MEA, 16 bits A/D conversion, 20 kHz sampling rate: approximately 8 GB/MEA,h uncompressed). Thus, when the experimental conditions to be tested are numerous, the availability of fast, standardized, and automated signal preprocessing becomes pivotal for any subsequent analysis and data archiving. To this aim, we developed an in-house cloud-computing system, named QSpike Tools, where CPU-intensive operations, required for preprocessing of each recorded channel (e.g., filtering, multi-unit activity detection, spike-sorting, etc.), are decomposed and batch-queued to a multi-core architecture or to a computers cluster. With the commercial availability of new and inexpensive high-density MEAs, we believe that disseminating QSpike Tools might facilitate its wide adoption and customization, and inspire the creation of community-supported cloud-computing facilities for MEAs users.

Indexed as

batch analysiscellular electrophysiologyembarrassingly parallel signal-processingextracellularMEAssubstrate arrays of microelectrodes

Identifiers

PMID24678297
PMCPMC3958706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.