ReviewAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2014
A review of organic and inorganic biomaterials for neural interfaces.
Review in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 162 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
162 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards maximizing optical access through Smart Dura.Journal of neural engineering · 2026Article
- Optical Detection of Cellular Signals at Material Interfaces.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Bioinspired organic materials for seamless neurohybrid interfaces: from material design to living electronics.Materials horizons · 2026Review
- Injectable Antifouling Adhesive Hydrogel Enables Robust Neural Interfaces for Stable ECoG Recording.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of Foreign Body Responses to Neural Electrodes and Surface Biofunctionalization Strategies for Interface Modulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Multimaterial 3D Printing of Soft and Stretchable Electronics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- PEDOT:PSS in peripheral nerve injury repair: electrical stimulation, neural interfaces, and neural regenerative mechanisms.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Materials and System Design for Self-Decision Bioelectronic Systems.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Anti-fatigue adhesive non-swelling hydrogel constructed by covalent topological structure and micro-nano gel for stretchable bioelectronics.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Bidirectional mechanisms and emerging strategies for implantable bioelectronic interfaces.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- An overbend strategy to manyfold enhance the designed elastic bendability of flexible electronics.Science advances · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing brain‒computer interfaces: overcoming biocompatibility challenges in implantable neural interfaces.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Implantable Self-Powered Systems for Electrical Stimulation Medical Devices.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Flexible graphene-based neurotechnology for high-precision deep brain mapping and neuromodulation in Parkinsonian rats.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Multi-material Electrohydrodynamic Printing of Bioelectronics with Sub-Microscale 3D Gold Pillars for In Vitro Extra- and Intra-Cellular Electrophysiological Recordings.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Recent Progress in Flexible Microelectrode Arrays for Combined Electrophysiological and Electrochemical Sensing.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Soft-Actuated Cuff Electrodes with Minimal Contact for Bidirectional Peripheral Interfaces.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Bioelectronic Medicines-A Novel Approach of Therapeutics in Current Epoch.Current pharmaceutical design · 2025Review
- Ultrasound-Mediated Non-Specific Splenic Immunopotentiation to Elicit Broad-Spectrum Anti-Neoplastic Effects.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2025Article
- Biomaterials for neuroengineering: applications and challenges.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
102 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in nanotechnology have generated wide interest in applying nanomaterials for neural prostheses. An ideal neural interface should create seamless integration into the nervous system and performs reliably for long periods of time. As a result, many nanoscale materials not originally developed for neural interfaces become attractive candidates to detect neural signals and stimulate neurons. In this comprehensive review, an overview of state-of-the-art microelectrode technologies provided fi rst, with focus on the material properties of these microdevices. The advancements in electro active nanomaterials are then reviewed, including conducting polymers, carbon nanotubes, graphene, silicon nanowires, and hybrid organic-inorganic nanomaterials, for neural recording, stimulation, and growth. Finally, technical and scientific challenges are discussed regarding biocompatibility, mechanical mismatch, and electrical properties faced by these nanomaterials for the development of long-lasting functional neural interfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.