Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24677195›Full record

ArticleHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2014

Hepatocellular carcinoma screening in patients with compensated hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis aware of their HCV status improves survival: a modeling approach.

Abbas Mourad, Sylvie Deuffic-Burban, Nathalie Ganne-Carrié, Thibaud Renaut-Vantroys, Isabelle Rosa, Anne-Marie Bouvier, Guy Launoy, Stephane Cattan, Alexandre Louvet, Sébastien Dharancy and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incidence Threshold for Surveillance in Virologically Cured Hepatitis C Individuals.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Conceptual Model for the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening Continuum: Current Status and Research Agenda.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Frequency and Outcomes of Abnormal Imaging in Patients With Cirrhosis Enrolled in a Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance Program.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Sperm-Associated Antigen 5 Expression Is Increased in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Indicates Poor Prognosis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Abbas MouradInserm U995, Université Lille Nord de France, Lille, France; IAME, UMR 1137, Inserm, Paris, France, Univ. Paris Nord Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Sylvie Deuffic-Burban
Nathalie Ganne-Carrié
Thibaud Renaut-Vantroys
Isabelle Rosa
Anne-Marie Bouvier
Guy Launoy
Stephane Cattan
Alexandre Louvet
Sébastien Dharancy
Jean-Claude Trinchet
Yazdan Yazdanpanah
Philippe Mathurin
Inserm · FRHôpital Claude Huriez · FRHôpital Jean-Verdier · FRHôpital Intercommunal de Créteil · FRSorbonne Paris Cité · FRUniversité Lille Nord de France · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledBecause of the ongoing debate on the benefit of ultrasound (US) screening for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we assessed the impact of screening on hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related compensated cirrhosis patients aware of their HCV status. A Markov model simulated progression from HCC diagnosis to death in 700 patients with HCV-related compensated cirrhosis aware of their HCV status to estimate life expectancy (LE) and cumulative death at 5 years. Five scenarios were compared: S1, no screening; S2, screening by currently existing practices (57% access and effectiveness leading to the diagnosis of 42% at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage [BCLC-0/A]); S3, S2 with increased access (97%); S4, S2 with an efficacy of screening close to that achieved in a randomized controlled trial leading to the diagnosis of 87% of patients at stage BCLC-0/A; S5, S3+S4. The analysis was corrected for lead-time bias. Currently existing practices of HCC screening increased LE by 11 months and reduced HCC mortality at 5 years by 6% compared to no screening (P = 0.0013). Compared to current screening practices, we found that: 1) increasing the rate of access to screening would increase LE by 7 months and reduce HCC mortality at 5 years by 5% (P = 0.045); 2) optimal screening would increase LE by 14 months and reduce HCC mortality at 5 years by 9% (P = 0.0002); 3) the combination of an increased rate of access and optimal effectiveness of HCC screening would increase LE by 31 months and decrease HCC mortality at 5 years by 20% (P < 0.0001).

conclusionThe present study shows that US screening for HCC in patients with compensated HCV-related cirrhosis aware of their HCV status improves survival and emphasizes the crucial role of screening effectiveness.

Indexed as

Markov ChainsAgedAntiviral AgentsCarcinoma, HepatocellularDisease ProgressionEarly Detection of CancerHepatitis CHumansLiver CirrhosisLiver NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySurvival RateTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographyAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID24677195
OpenAlexW2089283038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.