Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24677028›Full record

ArticleCancer2014

Feasibility, efficacy, and adverse effects of outpatient antibacterial prophylaxis in children with acute myeloid leukemia.

Hiroto Inaba, Aditya H Gaur, Xueyuan Cao, Patricia M Flynn, Stanley B Pounds, Viswatej Avutu, Lindsay N Marszal, Scott C Howard, Ching-Hon Pui, Raul C Ribeiro and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Levofloxacin for Antibacterial Prophylaxis in Pediatric Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Antibacterial prophylaxis in pediatric patients with leukemia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroto InabaDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee; Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Aditya H Gaur
Xueyuan Cao
Patricia M Flynn
Stanley B Pounds
Viswatej Avutu
Lindsay N Marszal
Scott C Howard
Ching-Hon Pui
Raul C Ribeiro
Randall T Hayden
Jeffrey E Rubnitz
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
PROFESSIONAL ONCOLOGY EDUCATION PROGRAMR25CA023944 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI SUZANNE A. GRONEMEYER · 1986 to 2026
$8.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCI NIH HHS R25 CA02394NCI NIH HHS R25 CA023944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensive chemotherapy for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia incurs the risk of infectious complications, but the benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis remain unclear.

methodsIn the current study, among 103 children treated on the AML02 protocol between October 2002 and October 2008 at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, the authors retrospectively assessed the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on the frequency of febrile neutropenia, clinically or microbiologically confirmed infections (including bacteremia), and antibiotic resistance, as well as on the results of nasal and rectal surveillance cultures. Initially, patients received no prophylaxis or oral cephalosporin (group A). The protocol was then amended to administer intravenous cefepime alone or intravenous vancomycin plus either oral cephalosporin, oral ciprofloxacin, or intravenous cefepime (group B).

resultsThere were 334 infectious episodes. Patients in group A had a significantly greater frequency of documented infections and bacteremia (both P < .0001) (including gram-positive and gram-negative bacteremia; P = .0003 and .001, respectively) compared with patients in group B, especially viridans streptococcal bacteremia (P = .001). The incidence of febrile neutropenia without documented infection was not found to be different between the 2 groups. Five cases of bacteremia with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) occurred in group B (vs none in group A), without related mortality. Two of these cases were preceded by positive VRE rectal surveillance cultures.

conclusionsOutpatient intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis is feasible in children with acute myeloid leukemia and reduces the frequency of documented infection but not of febrile neutropenia. Despite the emergence of VRE bacteremia, the benefits favor antibiotic prophylaxis. Creative approaches to shorten the duration of prophylaxis and thereby minimize resistance should be explored.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisAdministration, OralAdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBacterial InfectionsCandidiasisCefepimeCephalosporinsChemotherapy-Induced Febrile NeutropeniaChildChild, PreschoolCiprofloxacinConsolidation ChemotherapyDrug Therapy, CombinationFeasibility StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefepimeCephalosporinsCiprofloxacinVancomycinacute myeloid leukemiaantibioticschildreninfectionprophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID24677028
PMCPMC4063871
OpenAlexW1525555991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.