ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2014
[Operative joint-preserving therapy of gonarthrosis].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The guiding principle of operative joint-preserving therapy of gonarthrosis is the search for a safe, minimally invasive, efficient and ultimately reasonably priced therapeutic procedure to preserve or restore joint integrity. A comprehensive analysis and treatment of pathologies adjacent to and distant (axis deviations) from the joint are prerequisites for success of treatment. A comparison of results from the current literature with respect to the operative treatment of arthritis is limited due to the divergence of indications, terminologies used, techniques of the therapeutic procedure, inhomogeneity of patient collectives and the different follow-up and control schemes (scores). Conclusive, prospective, randomized double blind studies with large case numbers are associated with a high degree of organizational effort in planning, patient recruitment and execution and remain a rarity. Long-term prognosis depends on the stage of arthritis at the time of the arthroscopic intervention. Operative measures, such as correction osteotomy can be effective in the early stages. A short duration of symptoms, mechanical blocking and low-grade cartilage damage are factors which have a favorable prognosis. Cell-based cartilage repair techniques can reduce secondary degenerative alterations only in cases of local cartilage damage representing a prearthritic condition. Advantages of autologous chondrocyte transplantation compared to microfracturing have been found depending on the size of the defect and the follow-up time period. Furthermore, preservation and replacement of primary knee stabilizers, such as the anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus, have an important function for secondary prevention. A one-for-all therapy for joint-preserving operative treatment of gonarthrosis is lacking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.