Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24676327›Full record

ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2014

Preoperative oral supplementation support in patients with esophageal cancer.

K Kubota, J Kuroda, M Yoshida, A Okada, T Deguchi, M Kitajima

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03529019 (Perioperative Nutritional Optimization in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03529019 early_phase1recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Perioperative Nutritional Optimization in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoston Medical CenterRan2018 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsCritical Limb Ischemia, Malnutrition, Nutritional SupplementsArmsEnsure Surgery Immunonutrition Shake, Ensure Enlive Advanced Nutrition Shake
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K KubotaK. Kubota, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital, Mita 1-4-3, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8329, Japan, Tel: +81-3-3451-8121; Fax: +81-3-3454-0067; E-mail: kubota@iuhw.ac.jp.
J Kuroda
M Yoshida
A Okada
T Deguchi
M Kitajima
Mita Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSurgeries for cancer of the esophagus are still associated with a high rate of postoperative morbidity. There are few reports of perioperative nutritional support for patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery, and there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine use of immunonutrition in these patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether preoperative immunonutrition positively influences key clinical outcomes such as postoperative infectious complications, mortality, length of hospital stay, and short-term survival in this population. DESIGN AND

settingWe undertook a retrospective investigation of the effects of preoperative nutritional support on the postoperative course of esophageal cancer surgery at the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

participantsFifty-five patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were included in this study. Of the 55 patients, 26 patients consumed a liquid dietary supplement (IMPACT group) before surgery and 29 patients did not (STANDARD group).

interventionBefore surgery, the IMPACT group consumed 750 ml (3 packs)/day of Impact for 5 consecutive days. MEASUREMENTS: The analysis was based on postoperative complications, hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, and short-term survival.

resultsSignificantly fewer patients developed postoperative infections in the IMPACT group compared with the STANDARD group (p=.007): 4 of 21 patients in the IMPACT group and 10 of 29 patients in the STANDARD group. Either an infectious complication or another complication developed in 8 patients in the IMPACT group and 13 patients in the STANDARD group, with the result that 6 patients in the STANDARD group died of postoperative complications (p=.001). The duration of hospitalization was 34 days in the IMPACT group and 48 days in the STANDARD group; hence, hospitalization was significantly shorter in patients treated with Impact (p=.008). The mean 6-month survival rates for the IMPACT group and the STANDARD group were 92% (24/26) and 72% (21/29), respectively (p=.028).

conclusionSimple preoperative supplementation significantly improved outcome. Administration of the supplemental diet before esophageal surgery appeared to be an effective strategy in reducing infectious complications, mortality, and hospitalization, and improving short-term survival.

Indexed as

Nutritional SupportPreoperative CareAdultAgedDietary SupplementsEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHospital MortalityHumansJapanLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID24676327
PMCPMC12880491
OpenAlexW2022783720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.