Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24676150›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

A reference pan-genome approach to comparative bacterial genomics: identification of novel epidemiological markers in pathogenic Campylobacter.

Guillaume Méric, Koji Yahara, Leonardos Mageiros, Ben Pascoe, Martin C J Maiden, Keith A Jolley, Samuel K Sheppard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Methicillin-sensitiveMicrobial genomics · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Heliyon · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guillaume MéricInstitute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Koji YaharaInstitute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom; Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Leonardos MageirosInstitute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Ben PascoeInstitute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Martin C J MaidenDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Keith A JolleyDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Samuel K SheppardInstitute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council G0801929Wellcome Trust 087622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing availability of hundreds of whole bacterial genomes provides opportunities for enhanced understanding of the genes and alleles responsible for clinically important phenotypes and how they evolved. However, it is a significant challenge to develop easy-to-use and scalable methods for characterizing these large and complex data and relating it to disease epidemiology. Existing approaches typically focus on either homologous sequence variation in genes that are shared by all isolates, or non-homologous sequence variation--focusing on genes that are differentially present in the population. Here we present a comparative genomics approach that simultaneously approximates core and accessory genome variation in pathogen populations and apply it to pathogenic species in the genus Campylobacter. A total of 7 published Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli genomes were selected to represent diversity across these species, and a list of all loci that were present at least once was compiled. After filtering duplicates a 7-isolate reference pan-genome, of 3,933 loci, was defined. A core genome of 1,035 genes was ubiquitous in the sample accounting for 59% of the genes in each isolate (average genome size of 1.68 Mb). The accessory genome contained 2,792 genes. A Campylobacter population sample of 192 genomes was screened for the presence of reference pan-genome loci with gene presence defined as a BLAST match of ≥ 70% identity over ≥ 50% of the locus length--aligned using MUSCLE on a gene-by-gene basis. A total of 21 genes were present only in C. coli and 27 only in C. jejuni, providing information about functional differences associated with species and novel epidemiological markers for population genomic analyses. Homologs of these genes were found in several of the genomes used to define the pan-genome and, therefore, would not have been identified using a single reference strain approach.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialGenomicsCampylobacterCampylobacter coliCampylobacter InfectionsCampylobacter jejuniGenetic VariationPhylogenyPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID24676150
PMCPMC3968026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.