Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24675901›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Worldwide patterns of ancestry, divergence, and admixture in domesticated cattle.

Jared E Decker, Stephanie D McKay, Megan M Rolf, Jaewoo Kim, Antonio Molina Alcalá, Tad S Sonstegard, Olivier Hanotte, Anders Götherström, Christopher M Seabury, Lisa Praharani and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 252 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
252citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

252 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

192 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Jared E DeckerDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
Stephanie D McKayDepartment of Animal Science, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.
Megan M RolfDepartment of Animal Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, United States of America.
Jaewoo KimDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
Antonio Molina AlcaláDepartamento de Genética, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Tad S SonstegardUSDA-ARS Bovine Functional Genomics Lab, Beltsville, Maryland, United States of America.
Olivier HanotteMedicine & Health Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Anders GötherströmEvolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
Christopher M SeaburyDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Lisa PraharaniIndonesian Research Institute for Animal Production, Ciawi, Bogor, Indonesia.
Masroor Ellahi BabarInstitute of Biochemistry & Biotechnology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
Luciana Correia de Almeida RegitanoAnimal Molecular Genetics, Embrapa Pecuaria Sudeste, Sao Carlos, Sao Paulo, Brasil.
Mehmet Ali YildizAnimal Science, Biometry and Genetics, Ankara University, Diskapi, Ankara, Turkey.
Michael P HeatonUSDA, ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska, United States of America.
Wan-Sheng LiuDepartment of Animal Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Chu-Zhao LeiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
James M ReecyDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Muhammad Saif-Ur-RehmanDepartment of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Robert D SchnabelDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
Jeremy F TaylorDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The domestication and development of cattle has considerably impacted human societies, but the histories of cattle breeds and populations have been poorly understood especially for African, Asian, and American breeds. Using genotypes from 43,043 autosomal single nucleotide polymorphism markers scored in 1,543 animals, we evaluate the population structure of 134 domesticated bovid breeds. Regardless of the analytical method or sample subset, the three major groups of Asian indicine, Eurasian taurine, and African taurine were consistently observed. Patterns of geographic dispersal resulting from co-migration with humans and exportation are recognizable in phylogenetic networks. All analytical methods reveal patterns of hybridization which occurred after divergence. Using 19 breeds, we map the cline of indicine introgression into Africa. We infer that African taurine possess a large portion of wild African auroch ancestry, causing their divergence from Eurasian taurine. We detect exportation patterns in Asia and identify a cline of Eurasian taurine/indicine hybridization in Asia. We also identify the influence of species other than Bos taurus taurus and B. t. indicus in the formation of Asian breeds. We detect the pronounced influence of Shorthorn cattle in the formation of European breeds. Iberian and Italian cattle possess introgression from African taurine. American Criollo cattle originate from Iberia, and not directly from Africa with African ancestry inherited via Iberian ancestors. Indicine introgression into American cattle occurred in the Americas, and not Europe. We argue that cattle migration, movement and trading followed by admixture have been important forces in shaping modern bovine genomic variation.

Indexed as

BreedingGenetic VariationPhylogenyAllelesAnimalsAnimals, DomesticCattleGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationHumansPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID24675901
PMCPMC3967955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.