Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24675893›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2014

MKK7 and ARF: new players in the DNA damage response scenery.

Athanassios Kotsinas, Panagiota Papanagnou, Panagiotis Galanos, Daniel Schramek, Paul Townsend, Josef M Penninger, Jiri Bartek, Vassilis G Gorgoulis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Athanassios KotsinasMolecular Carcinogenesis Group; Department of Histology and Embryology; School of Medicine; University of Athens; Athens, Greece.
Panagiota PapanagnouMolecular Carcinogenesis Group; Department of Histology and Embryology; School of Medicine; University of Athens; Athens, Greece.
Panagiotis GalanosMolecular Carcinogenesis Group; Department of Histology and Embryology; School of Medicine; University of Athens; Athens, Greece.
Daniel SchramekHoward Hughes Medical Institute; Laboratory of Mammalian Cell Biology and Development; The Rockefeller University; New York, NY USA.
Paul TownsendFaculty Institute of Cancer Sciences; University of Manchester; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; Manchester, UK; Manchester Centre for Cellular Metabolism; University of Manchester; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; Manchester, UK.
Josef M PenningerIMBA, Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences; Vienna, Austria.
Jiri BartekDanish Cancer Society Research Center; Copenhagen, Denmark; Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine; Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry; Palacky University; Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Vassilis G GorgoulisMolecular Carcinogenesis Group; Department of Histology and Embryology; School of Medicine; University of Athens; Athens, Greece; Faculty Institute of Cancer Sciences; University of Manchester; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; Manchester, UK; Manchester Centre for Cellular Metabolism; University of Manchester; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; Manchester, UK; Biomedical Research Foundation; Academy of Athens; Athens, Greece.
Indiana University School of MedicineManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBAthens State University · USFaculty (United Kingdom) · GBInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology · ATNew York Proton Center · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensing, integrating, and processing of stressogenic signals must be followed by accurate differential response(s) for a cell to survive and avoid malignant transformation. The DNA damage response (DDR) pathway is vital in this process, as it deals with genotoxic/oncogenic insults, having p53 as a nodal effector that performs most of the above tasks. Accumulating data reveal that other pathways are also involved in the same or similar processes, conveying also to p53. Emerging questions are if, how, and when these additional pathways communicate with the DDR axis. Two such stress response pathways, involving the MKK7 stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK) and ARF, have been shown to be interlocked with the ATM/ATR-regulated DDR axis in a highly ordered manner. This creates a new landscape in the DDR orchestrated response to genotoxic/oncogenic insults that is currently discussed.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairReading FramesAnimalsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsHumansMAP Kinase Kinase 7Oncogenesp38 Mitogen-Activated Protein KinasesPhosphorylationSignal TransductionTumor Suppressor Protein p53Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanATR protein, humanMAP2K7 protein, humanMAP Kinase Kinase 7p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein KinasesTumor Suppressor Protein p53anti-tumor barrierARFDNA damage responsefeedback loopMKK7p38 MAPKp53replication stresssenescenceWip-1

Identifiers

PMID24675893
PMCPMC4049959
OpenAlexW2040957529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.