Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24675882›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2014

Establishment of a replication fork barrier following induction of DNA binding in mammalian cells.

Paolo Beuzer, Jean-Pierre Quivy, Geneviève Almouzni

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Visualizing DNA repair factor recruitment at sites of transcription in single cells.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Transgenerational Tracking of Chromosomes from Micronuclei.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Characterization of Unidirectional Replication Forks in the Mouse Genome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. DNA damage responses that enhance resilience to replication stress.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Paolo BeuzerInstitut Curie; Centre de Recherche; Paris, France; CNRS; UMR3664; Paris, France; Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer; UMR3664; Paris, France; UPMC; UMR3664; Paris, France; Sorbonne University; PSL; Paris, France.
Jean-Pierre QuivyInstitut Curie; Centre de Recherche; Paris, France; CNRS; UMR3664; Paris, France; Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer; UMR3664; Paris, France; UPMC; UMR3664; Paris, France; Sorbonne University; PSL; Paris, France.
Geneviève AlmouzniInstitut Curie; Centre de Recherche; Paris, France; CNRS; UMR3664; Paris, France; Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer; UMR3664; Paris, France; UPMC; UMR3664; Paris, France; Sorbonne University; PSL; Paris, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms that lead to replication fork blocks (RFB) and the means to bypass them is important given the threat that they represent for genome stability if inappropriately handled. Here, to study this issue in mammals, we use integrated arrays of the LacO and/or TetO as a tractable system to follow in time a process in an individual cell and at a single locus. Importantly, we show that induction of the binding by LacI and TetR proteins, and not the presence of the repeats, is key to form the RFB. We find that the binding of the proteins to the arrays during replication causes a prolonged persistence of replication foci at the site. This, in turn, induces a local DNA damage repair (DDR) response, with the recruitment of proteins involved in double-strand break (DSB) repair such as TOPBP1 and 53BP1, and the phosphorylation of H2AX. Furthermore, the appearance of micronuclei and DNA bridges after mitosis is consistent with an incomplete replication. We discuss how the many DNA binding proteins encountered during replication can be dealt with and the consequences of incomplete replication. Future studies exploiting this type of system should help analyze how an RFB, along with bypass mechanisms, are controlled in order to maintain genome integrity.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationAnimalsCarrier ProteinsCell Line, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairHistonesHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMiceNuclear ProteinsPhosphorylationS PhaseTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1Carrier ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsH2AX protein, humanHistonesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsNuclear ProteinsTOPBP1 protein, humanTP53BP1 protein, humanTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1DNA damage repairDNA replicationgenome instabilityLacO-LacIreplication fork blockTetO-TetR

Identifiers

PMID24675882
PMCPMC4050166
OpenAlexW2044464666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.