Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24675716›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Dying cells protect survivors from radiation-induced cell death in Drosophila.

Amber Bilak, Lyle Uyetake, Tin Tin Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The constructive function of apoptosis: More than a dead-end job.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  9. Regulation and coordination of the different DNA damage responses inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. What Drosophila Can Teach Us About Radiation Biology of Human Cancers.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. An apoptosis-driven 'onco-regenerative niche': roles of tumour-associated macrophages and extracellular vesicles.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  17. Loss ofeLife · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Advances in wound care · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amber BilakDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Lyle UyetakeDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Tin Tin SuDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.

Funding

Regulation of Radiation Induced Cell Death in DrosophilaR01GM087276 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI SU, TIN TIN · 2009 to 2012
$1.3M
Consequences of Cell Death in DrosophilaR01GM106317 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI SU, TIN TIN · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087276NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106317NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM87276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a phenomenon wherein induction of cell death by a variety of means in wing imaginal discs of Drosophila larvae resulted in the activation of an anti-apoptotic microRNA, bantam. Cells in the vicinity of dying cells also become harder to kill by ionizing radiation (IR)-induced apoptosis. Both ban activation and increased protection from IR required receptor tyrosine kinase Tie, which we identified in a genetic screen for modifiers of ban. tie mutants were hypersensitive to radiation, and radiation sensitivity of tie mutants was rescued by increased ban gene dosage. We propose that dying cells activate ban in surviving cells through Tie to make the latter cells harder to kill, thereby preserving tissues and ensuring organism survival. The protective effect we report differs from classical radiation bystander effect in which neighbors of irradiated cells become more prone to death. The protective effect also differs from the previously described effect of dying cells that results in proliferation of nearby cells in Drosophila larval discs. If conserved in mammals, a phenomenon in which dying cells make the rest harder to kill by IR could have implications for treatments that involve the sequential use of cytotoxic agents and radiation therapy.

Indexed as

Imaginal DiscsAnimalsCell DeathCell SurvivalDrosophila melanogasterLarvaMicroRNAsRadiation, IonizingRadiation ToleranceWings, AnimalMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID24675716
PMCPMC3967929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.