Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24675689›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Proximity to sports facilities and sports participation for adolescents in Germany.

Anne K Reimers, Matthias Wagner, Seraphim Alvanides, Andreas Steinmayr, Miriam Reiner, Steffen Schmidt, Alexander Woll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Children's Independent Mobility: Current Knowledge, Future Directions, and Public Health Implications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Review
  16. Physical Activity and Outdoor Play of Children in Public Playgrounds-Do Gender and Social Environment Matter?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anne K ReimersDepartment of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany; Institute of Sport and Sport Sciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Matthias WagnerDepartment of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Seraphim AlvanidesDepartment of Geography and the Built Environment, Northumbria University, Ellison Building, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.
Andreas SteinmayrSwiss Institute for Empirical Economic Research (SEW), University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Miriam ReinerInstitute of Sport and Sport Sciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Steffen SchmidtInstitute of Sport and Sport Sciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Alexander WollInstitute of Sport and Sport Sciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the relationship between proximity to specific sports facilities and participation in the corresponding sports activities for adolescents in Germany.

methodsA sample of 1,768 adolescents aged 11-17 years old and living in 161 German communities was examined. Distances to the nearest sports facilities were calculated as an indicator of proximity to sports facilities using Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Participation in specific leisure-time sports activities in sports clubs was assessed using a self-report questionnaire and individual-level socio-demographic variables were derived from a parent questionnaire. Community-level socio-demographics as covariates were selected from the INKAR database, in particular from indicators and maps on land development. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between proximity to the nearest sports facilities and participation in the corresponding sports activities.

resultsThe logistic regression analyses showed that girls residing longer distances from the nearest gym were less likely to engage in indoor sports activities; a significant interaction between distances to gyms and level of urbanization was identified. Decomposition of the interaction term showed that for adolescent girls living in rural areas participation in indoor sports activities was positively associated with gym proximity. Proximity to tennis courts and indoor pools was not associated with participation in tennis or water sports, respectively.

conclusionsImproved proximity to gyms is likely to be more important for female adolescents living in rural areas.

Indexed as

Motor ActivityPublic FacilitiesSportsAdolescentDatabases, FactualGermanyHumansLeisure ActivitiesSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID24675689
PMCPMC3968093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.