ArticlePLoS computational biology2014
An integrated model of multiple-condition ChIP-Seq data reveals predeterminants of Cdx2 binding.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Frustratingly easy" domain adaptation for cross-species transcription factor binding prediction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Rescuing biologically relevant consensus regions across replicated samples.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Assessing and assuring interoperability of a genomics file format.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Concurrent CDX2 cis-deregulation and UBTF::ATXN7L3 fusion define a novel high-risk subtype of B-cell ALL.Blood · 2022Article
- ePeak: from replicated chromatin profiling data to epigenomic dynamics.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Comprehensive assessment of differential ChIP-seq tools guides optimal algorithm selection.Genome biology · 2022Article
- The BTB transcription factors ZBTB11 and ZFP131 maintain pluripotency by repressing pro-differentiation genes.Cell reports · 2022Article
- Domain-adaptive neural networks improve cross-species prediction of transcription factor binding.Genome research · 2022Article
- Foxa2 and Pet1 Direct and Indirect Synergy Drive Serotonergic Neuronal Differentiation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Transcription factor-mediated intestinal metaplasia and the role of a shadow enhancer.Genes & development · 2022Article
- Resolving diverse protein-DNA footprints from exonuclease-based ChIP experiments.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- An interpretable bimodal neural network characterizes the sequence and preexisting chromatin predictors of induced transcription factor binding.Genome biology · 2021Article
- Genome-wide binding analysis of 195 DNA binding proteins reveals "reservoir" promoters and human specific SVA-repeat family regulation.PloS one · 2021Article
- Article
- Differential abilities to engage inaccessible chromatin diversify vertebrate Hox binding patterns.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2020Article
- Pioneer Transcription Factors Initiating Gene Network Changes.Annual review of genetics · 2020Review
- Alignment and quantification of ChIP-exo crosslinking patterns reveal the spatial organization of protein-DNA complexes.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Sequence and chromatin determinants of transcription factor binding and the establishment of cell type-specific binding patterns.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Gene regulatory mechanisms · 2020Review
- ncHMR detector: a computational framework to systematically reveal non-classical functions of histone modification regulators.Genome biology · 2020Article
- Characterizing protein-DNA binding event subtypes in ChIP-exo data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Regulatory proteins can bind to different sets of genomic targets in various cell types or conditions. To reliably characterize such condition-specific regulatory binding we introduce MultiGPS, an integrated machine learning approach for the analysis of multiple related ChIP-seq experiments. MultiGPS is based on a generalized Expectation Maximization framework that shares information across multiple experiments for binding event discovery. We demonstrate that our framework enables the simultaneous modeling of sparse condition-specific binding changes, sequence dependence, and replicate-specific noise sources. MultiGPS encourages consistency in reported binding event locations across multiple-condition ChIP-seq datasets and provides accurate estimation of ChIP enrichment levels at each event. MultiGPS's multi-experiment modeling approach thus provides a reliable platform for detecting differential binding enrichment across experimental conditions. We demonstrate the advantages of MultiGPS with an analysis of Cdx2 binding in three distinct developmental contexts. By accurately characterizing condition-specific Cdx2 binding, MultiGPS enables novel insight into the mechanistic basis of Cdx2 site selectivity. Specifically, the condition-specific Cdx2 sites characterized by MultiGPS are highly associated with pre-existing genomic context, suggesting that such sites are pre-determined by cell-specific regulatory architecture. However, MultiGPS-defined condition-independent sites are not predicted by pre-existing regulatory signals, suggesting that Cdx2 can bind to a subset of locations regardless of genomic environment. A summary of this paper appears in the proceedings of the RECOMB 2014 conference, April 2-5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.