Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24675475›Full record

ArticleToxicology2014

Phenobarbital and propiconazole toxicogenomic profiles in mice show major similarities consistent with the key role that constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) activation plays in their mode of action.

Richard A Currie, Richard C Peffer, Amber K Goetz, Curtis J Omiecinski, Jay I Goodman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Clinical Relevance of the Constitutive Androstane Receptor.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Small-molecule modulators of the constitutive androstane receptor.Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard A CurrieSyngenta Ltd., Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell, Berkshire RG42 6EY, UK. Electronic address: richard.currie@syngenta.com.
Richard C PefferSyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419-8300, United States. Electronic address: richard.peffer@syngenta.com.
Amber K GoetzSyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419-8300, United States. Electronic address: amber.goetz@syngenta.com.
Curtis J OmiecinskiCenter for Molecular Toxicology and Carcinogenesis, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States. Electronic address: cjo10@psu.edu.
Jay I GoodmanDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States. Electronic address: goodman3@msu.edu.
Syngenta (United States) · USMichigan State University · USPennsylvania State University · USSyngenta (China) · CN

Funding

Targeting Dynamics of CAR and PXR in the Mouse and Human GenomesR01GM066411 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI OMIECINSKI, CURTIS J · 2002 to 2017
$4.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM066411NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxicogenomics (TGx) is employed frequently to investigate underlying molecular mechanisms of the compound of interest and, thus, has become an aid to mode of action determination. However, the results and interpretation of a TGx dataset are influenced by the experimental design and methods of analysis employed. This article describes an evaluation and reanalysis, by two independent laboratories, of previously published TGx mouse liver microarray data for a triazole fungicide, propiconazole (PPZ), and the anticonvulsant drug phenobarbital (PB). Propiconazole produced an increase incidence of liver tumors in male CD-1 mice only at a dose that exceeded the maximum tolerated dose (2500 ppm). Firstly, we illustrate how experimental design differences between two in vivo studies with PPZ and PB may impact the comparisons of TGx results. Secondly, we demonstrate that different researchers using different pathway analysis tools can come to different conclusions on specific mechanistic pathways, even when using the same datasets. Finally, despite these differences the results across three different analyses also show a striking degree of similarity observed for PPZ and PB treated livers when the expression data are viewed as major signaling pathways and cell processes affected. Additional studies described here show that the postulated key event of hepatocellular proliferation was observed in CD-1 mice for both PPZ and PB, and that PPZ is also a potent activator of the mouse CAR nuclear receptor. Thus, with regard to the events which are hallmarks of CAR-induced effects that are key events in the mode of action (MOA) of mouse liver carcinogenesis with PB, PPZ-induced tumors can be viewed as being promoted by a similar PB-like CAR-dependent MOA.

Indexed as

CarcinogensAnimalsCarcinogenicity TestsCell ProliferationConstitutive Androstane ReceptorFemaleFungicides, IndustrialGenes, ReporterHepatocytesHypnotics and SedativesMaleMiceNeoplasms, ExperimentalOrgan SizePhenobarbitalReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearCarcinogensConstitutive Androstane ReceptorFungicides, IndustrialHypnotics and SedativesPhenobarbitalpropiconazoleReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearTriazolesConazolesConstitutive androstane receptorPhenobarbitalPropiconazoleToxicogenomics

Identifiers

PMID24675475
PMCPMC4089507
OpenAlexW2050861156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.