Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24675255›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of oncology nursing2014

Pain: a descriptive study in patients with cancer.

Nadine Matthie, Susan C McMillan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of oncology nursing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Understanding the Self-Management Practices of Young Adults with Sickle Cell Disease.Journal of sickle cell disease and hemoglobinopathies · 2017
    Article
  2. Pain in cancer patients: pain assessment by patients and family caregivers and problems experienced by caregivers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2015
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nadine MatthieSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill.
Susan C McMillanCollege of Nursing, University of South Florida in Tampa.

Funding

Systematic Assessment to Improve Hospice OutcomesR01NR008252 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI MCMILLAN, SUSAN C · 2004 to 2007
$1.6M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR008252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ninety percent of patients with advanced cancer are reported to experience pain at some time during the course of their illness. This pain usually is improperly evaluated because it varies by patient and is difficult to control. Pain often cannot be conceptualized because of the individual nature of patient experience; however, patterns of pain occur in those suffering from similar conditions. This secondary analysis was conducted to examine the characteristics of pain in individuals with advanced cancer. The sample consisted of 717 patients with cancer who were receiving hospice home care in the southeastern United States. An understanding of the total pain experience, including type of pain and pain location, is important for addressing pain in patients with cancer in hospice care. More effective strategies are needed for pain management in this patient population. In addition, steps need to be taken to ensure that hospice care is understood by and made available to minorities.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPainSoutheastern United StatesYoung Adultcancer painpainpain experiencepatterns of pain

Identifiers

PMID24675255
PMCPMC11089521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.