Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24674922›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2014

The selective vasopressin type 1a receptor agonist selepressin (FE 202158) blocks vascular leak in ovine severe sepsis*.

Marc O Maybauer, Dirk M Maybauer, Perenlei Enkhbaatar, Régent Laporte, Halina Wiśniewska, Lillian D Traber, ChiiDean Lin, Juanjuan Fan, Hal K Hawkins, Robert A Cox and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Selepressin, a novel selective vasopressin VCritical care (London, England) · 2017
    Trial
  4. Peptide-Based Approaches for Pain Relief and Healing in Wounds.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Therapeutic peptides: current applications and future directions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marc O Maybauer *Investigational Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Dirk M Maybauer *Investigational Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Perenlei Enkhbaatar *Investigational Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Régent Laporte *Ferring Research Institute, Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Halina WiśniewskaFerring Research Institute, Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Lillian D TraberInvestigational Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
ChiiDean LinDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Juanjuan FanDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Hal K HawkinsDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Robert A CoxDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Kazimierz WiśniewskiFerring Research Institute, Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Claudio D SchteingartFerring Research Institute, Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Donald W LandryDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University, New York City, New York, United States of America.
Pierre J-M RivièreFerring Research Institute, Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Daniel L TraberInvestigational Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Philipps University of Marburg · DESan Diego State University · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USColumbia University · US

Funding

Etiology of Microvascular Changes in Gram-positive Sepsis: Mechanisms and Therapeutic OptionsR01GM097480 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI ENKHBAATAR, PERENLEI · 2012 to 2022
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM097480NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine if the selective vasopressin type 1a receptor agonist selepressin (FE 202158) is as effective as the mixed vasopressin type 1a receptor/vasopressin V2 receptor agonist vasopressor hormone arginine vasopressin when used as a titrated first-line vasopressor therapy in an ovine model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia-induced severe sepsis.

designProspective, randomized, controlled laboratory experiment.

settingUniversity animal research facility. SUBJECTS: Forty-five chronically instrumented sheep.

interventionsSheep were anesthetized, insufflated with cooled cotton smoke via tracheostomy, and P. aeruginosa were instilled into their airways. They were then placed on assisted ventilation, awakened, and resuscitated with lactated Ringer's solution titrated to maintain hematocrit ± 3% from baseline levels. If, despite fluid management, mean arterial pressure fell by more than 10 mm Hg from baseline level, an additional continuous IV infusion of arginine vasopressin or selepressin was titrated to raise and maintain mean arterial pressure within no less than 10 mm Hg from baseline level. Effects of combination treatment of selepressin with the selective vasopressin V2 receptor agonist desmopressin were similarly investigated. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsIn septic sheep, MAP fell by ~30 mm Hg, systemic vascular resistance index decreased by ~50%, and ~7 L of fluid were retained over 24 hours; this fluid accumulation was partially reduced by arginine vasopressin and almost completely blocked by selepressin; and combined infusion of selepressin and desmopressin increased fluid accumulation to levels similar to arginine vasopressin treatment.

conclusionsResuscitation with the selective vasopressin type 1a receptor agonist selepressin blocked vascular leak more effectively than the mixed vasopressin type 1a receptor/vasopressin V2 receptor agonist arginine vasopressin because of its lack of agonist activity at the vasopressin V2 receptor.

Indexed as

AnimalsArginine VasopressinDrug Therapy, CombinationHemodynamicsPneumonia, BacterialPseudomonas aeruginosaRandom AllocationReceptors, VasopressinRespiratory MechanicsSepsisSheepVasoconstrictor AgentsVasopressinsArginine VasopressinReceptors, VasopressinVasoconstrictor Agentsvasopressin, Phe(2)-Ile(3)-Hgn(4)-Orn(iPr)(8)-Vasopressins

Identifiers

PMID24674922
PMCPMC4346299
OpenAlexW2472910880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.