Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24674853›Full record

Trial reportPreventive medicine2014

Involving community stakeholders to increase park use and physical activity.

Kathryn Pitkin Derose, Terry Marsh, Mark Mariscal, Sophia Pina-Cortez, Deborah A Cohen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Preventive medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Association between Urban Greenspace and Health: A Systematic Review of Literature.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. The Use of Social Marketing in Community-Wide Physical Activity Programs: A Scoping Review.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Racial-Ethnic Variation in Park Use and Physical Activity in the City of Los Angeles.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kathryn Pitkin DeroseRAND Corporation, 1776 Main St, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA. Electronic address: derose@rand.org.
Terry MarshRAND Corporation, 1776 Main St, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA. Electronic address: tmarsh@rand.org.
Mark MariscalLos Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks, 1670 Palos Verdes Drive North, Harbor City, CA 90710, USA. Electronic address: mark.mariscal@lacity.org.
Sophia Pina-CortezLos Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks, 3900 Chevy Chase Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90039, USA. Electronic address: sophia.pinacortez@lacity.org.
Deborah A CohenRAND Corporation, 1776 Main St, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA. Electronic address: dcohen@rand.org.

Funding

PARKS AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN DIVERSE COMMUNITIESR01HL083869 · NHLBI · RAND CORPORATION · PI COHEN, DEBORAH A · 2007 to 2011
$3.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL083869NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL083869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study is to describe implementation of a randomized controlled trial of community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches to increase park use and physical activity across 33 diverse neighborhoods in Los Angeles.

methodsFifty parks were randomly assigned based on park size, facilities and programs, and neighborhood socio-demographic characteristics to: park director (PD, 17 parks); PD and park advisory board of interested community members (PD+PAB, 16 parks); and no-intervention control (17 parks) arms. Between 2007 and 2012, PDs and PABs from the 33 intervention parks participated in community engagement, baseline assessment, marketing training, intervention design and implementation, and follow-up assessment.

resultsIntervention parks (PD and PD+PAB) invested in new and diversified signage, promotional items, outreach or support for group activities like fitness classes and walking clubs, and various marketing strategies. Scaling up CBPR methods across parks in 33 diverse neighborhoods was challenging. Working with departmental management and established structures for community input (PABs) and park policy (PDs) facilitated implementation and sustainability.

conclusionScaling up CBPR methods across diverse communities involved tradeoffs. CBPR is useful for tailoring research and enhancing community impact and sustainability, but more work is needed to understand how to conduct multi-site trials across diverse settings using CBPR.

Indexed as

ExerciseRecreationCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity-Institutional RelationsEnvironment DesignEthnicityHealth PromotionHumansLos AngelesMarketing of Health ServicesProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationPublic FacilitiesResidence CharacteristicsSocioeconomic FactorsCommunity-based participatory researchExerciseRecreation

Identifiers

PMID24674853
PMCPMC4066457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.