ArticleNeuroscience letters2014
Endothelin-1-induced priming to capsaicin in young animals.
Article in Neuroscience letters, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modulation of pain in pediatric sickle cell disease: understanding the balance between endothelin mediated vasoconstriction and apelin mediated vasodilation.Blood cells, molecules & diseases · 2015Article
- Endothelin-1 induced desensitization in primary afferent neurons.Neuroscience letters · 2014Article
- Evidence for the endothelin system as an emerging therapeutic target for the treatment of chronic pain.Journal of pain research · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a known algogen that causes acute pain and sensitization in humans and spontaneous nociceptive behaviors when injected into the periphery in rats. This study sought to examine the effect of ET-1 exposure in the neonatal period on subsequent contralateral capsaicin-induced secondary mechanical hyperalgesia. ET-1 or saline was injected into the left plantar hindpaw on postnatal day 7 (P7). On postnatal day 11 (P11), capsaicin cream or control lotion was applied to the right dorsum hind paw and mechanical paw withdrawal thresholds were measured in the plantar hind paw. In saline control males, P11 administration of capsaicin produced a secondary mechanical hyperalgesia that was still present at 2h. Neonatal priming with ET-1 did not alter the magnitude or the duration of secondary mechanical hyperalgesia in males. In contrast, in control females, P11 administration of capsaicin produced less than 40 min of mechanical hyperalgesia. Neonatal priming with ET-1 prolonged the duration of secondary mechanical hyperalgesia in females. Priming with ET-1 on P7 led to a significant increase in capsaicin-induced Fos expression in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord in both males and females compared to controls (p<0.001). These findings further suggest that pain in early life may alter future responses to painful stimuli at both the behavioral and neuronal level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.