ArticleBMC bioinformatics2014
TSSAR: TSS annotation regime for dRNA-seq data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- TSSpredator-Web: A web-application for transcription start site prediction and exploration.PloS one · 2026Article
- Precision run-on sequencing (PRO-seq) for microbiome transcriptomics.Nature microbiology · 2024Article
- Identification of NAD-RNA species and ADPR-RNA decapping in Archaea.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- Genome-Wide Transcription Start Sites Mapping inMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Article
- Comparative transcriptomic analysis of Rickettsia conorii during in vitro infection of human and tick host cells.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Whole-genome Identification of Transcriptional Start Sites by Differential RNA-seq in Bacteria.Bio-protocol · 2020Article
- tappAS: a comprehensive computational framework for the analysis of the functional impact of differential splicing.Genome biology · 2020Article
- Genome-Wide Transcription Start Site Mapping and Promoter Assignments to a Sigma Factor in the Human EnteropathogenFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- The Primary Antisense Transcriptome ofGenes · 2019Article
- A TetR-Family Protein (CAETHG_0459) Activates Transcription From a New Promoter Motif Associated With Essential Genes for Autotrophic Growth in Acetogens.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- ANNOgesic: a Swiss army knife for the RNA-seq based annotation of bacterial/archaeal genomes.GigaScience · 2018Article
- Third-generation Sequencing Reveals Extensive Polycistronism and Transcriptional Overlapping in a Baculovirus.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Primary transcriptome analysis reveals importance of IS elements for the shaping of the transcriptional landscape of Bordetella pertussis.RNA biology · 2018Article
- Internal RNAs overlapping coding sequences can drive the production of alternative proteins in archaea.RNA biology · 2018Article
- BAC-BROWSER: The Tool for Visualization and Analysis of Prokaryotic Genomes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Long-Read Sequencing of Human Cytomegalovirus Transcriptome Reveals RNA Isoforms Carrying Distinct Coding Potentials.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Nitrogen cost minimization is promoted by structural changes in the transcriptome of N-deprived Prochlorococcus cells.The ISME journal · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferential RNA sequencing (dRNA-seq) is a high-throughput screening technique designed to examine the architecture of bacterial operons in general and the precise position of transcription start sites (TSS) in particular. Hitherto, dRNA-seq data were analyzed by visualizing the sequencing reads mapped to the reference genome and manually annotating reliable positions. This is very labor intensive and, due to the subjectivity, biased.
resultsHere, we present TSSAR, a tool for automated de novo TSS annotation from dRNA-seq data that respects the statistics of dRNA-seq libraries. TSSAR uses the premise that the number of sequencing reads starting at a certain genomic position within a transcriptional active region follows a Poisson distribution with a parameter that depends on the local strength of expression. The differences of two dRNA-seq library counts thus follow a Skellam distribution. This provides a statistical basis to identify significantly enriched primary transcripts.We assessed the performance by analyzing a publicly available dRNA-seq data set using TSSAR and two simple approaches that utilize user-defined score cutoffs. We evaluated the power of reproducing the manual TSS annotation. Furthermore, the same data set was used to reproduce 74 experimentally validated TSS in H. pylori from reliable techniques such as RACE or primer extension. Both analyses showed that TSSAR outperforms the static cutoff-dependent approaches.
conclusionsHaving an automated and efficient tool for analyzing dRNA-seq data facilitates the use of the dRNA-seq technique and promotes its application to more sophisticated analysis. For instance, monitoring the plasticity and dynamics of the transcriptomal architecture triggered by different stimuli and growth conditions becomes possible.The main asset of a novel tool for dRNA-seq analysis that reaches out to a broad user community is usability. As such, we provide TSSAR both as intuitive RESTful Web service ( http://rna.tbi.univie.ac.at/TSSAR) together with a set of post-processing and analysis tools, as well as a stand-alone version for use in high-throughput dRNA-seq data analysis pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.