Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24673674›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2014

Validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit in older emergency department patients.

Jin H Han, Amanda Wilson, Amy J Graves, Ayumi Shintani, John F Schnelle, Robert S Dittus, James S Powers, John Vernon, Alan B Storrow, E Wesley Ely

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03642249 (Evaluating the Effects of Implementing an Scenario-based Education Initiative and OSCE for Recognition and Management of Delirium in Adult Intensive Care Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03642249 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating the Effects of Implementing an Scenario-based Education Initiative and OSCE for Recognition and Management of Delirium in Adult Intensive Care Unit: Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTaipei Medical UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled72ConditionsDelirium, Intensive Care Unit Syndrome, Nurse-Patient RelationsArmsOSCEs, Lecture, E-learning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Hospital 4Ms: Documentation and association with patient characteristics.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jin H HanCenter for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Amanda Wilson
Amy J Graves
Ayumi Shintani
John F Schnelle
Robert S Dittus
James S Powers
John Vernon
Alan B Storrow
E Wesley Ely
Vanderbilt University · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USVirginia Commonwealth University Medical Center · US

Funding

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
The MIND USA StudyR01AG035117 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ELY, E WESLEY · 2011 to 2016
$7.3M
The Vanderbilt Emergency Medicine Research Training Program (VEMRT)K12HL109019 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI COLLINS, SEAN PATRICK, STORROW, ALAN B · 2011 to 2015
$3.7M
The MIND ICU StudyR01AG027472 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ELY, E WESLEY · 2006 to 2010
$3.0M
Delirium in the Emergency Department: Novel Screening and Natural CourseK23AG032355 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI HAN, JIN HO · 2010 to 2014
$745k
NCATS NIH HHS 2 UL1 TR000445-06NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975-01NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL109019NIA NIH HHS K23 AG032355NIA NIH HHS K23AG032355NIA NIH HHS R01 AG027472NIA NIH HHS R01AG027472NIA NIH HHS R01 AG035117NIA NIH HHS R01AG035117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn the emergency department (ED), health care providers miss delirium approximately 75% of the time, because they do not routinely screen for this syndrome. The Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) is a brief (<1 minute) delirium assessment that may be feasible for use in the ED. The study objective was to determine its validity and reliability in older ED patients.

methodsIn this prospective observational cohort study, patients aged 65 years or older were enrolled at an academic, tertiary care ED from July 2009 to February 2012. An emergency physician (EP) and research assistants (RAs) performed the CAM-ICU. The reference standard for delirium was a comprehensive (~30 minutes) psychiatrist assessment using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision criteria. All assessments were blinded to each other and were conducted within 3 hours. Sensitivities, specificities, and likelihood ratios were calculated for both the EP and the RAs using the psychiatrist's assessment as the reference standard. Kappa values between the EP and RAs were also calculated to measure reliability.

resultsOf 406 patients enrolled, 50 (12.3%) had delirium. The median age was 73.5 years old (interquartile range [IQR] = 69 to 80 years), 202 (49.8%) were female, and 57 (14.0%) were nonwhite. The CAM-ICU's sensitivities were 72.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 58.3% to 82.5%) and 68.0% (95% CI = 54.2% to 79.2%) in the EP and RAs, respectively. The CAM-ICU's specificity was 98.6% (95% CI = 96.8% to 99.4%) for both raters. The negative likelihood ratios (LR-) were 0.28 (95% CI = 0.18 to 0.44) and 0.32 (95% CI = 0.22 to 0.49) in the EP and RAs, respectively. The positive likelihood ratios (LR+) were 51.3 (95% CI = 21.1 to 124.5) and 48.4 (95% CI = 19.9 to 118.0), respectively. The kappa between the EP and RAs was 0.92 (95% CI = 0.85 to 0.98), indicating excellent interobserver reliability.

conclusionsIn older ED patients, the CAM-ICU is highly specific, and a positive test is nearly diagnostic for delirium when used by both the EP and RAs. However, the CAM-ICU's sensitivity was modest, and a negative test decreased the likelihood of delirium by a small amount. The consequences of a false-negative CAM-ICU are unknown and deserve further study.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAgedAged, 80 and overConfusionDeliriumFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLikelihood FunctionsLogistic ModelsMaleObserver VariationProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID24673674
PMCPMC4034173
OpenAlexW2004787599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.