Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24672583›Full record

ReviewTheranostics2014

Bioabsorbable stent quo vadis: a case for nano-theranostics.

Buket Gundogan, Aaron Tan, Yasmin Farhatnia, Mohammad S Alavijeh, Zhanfeng Cui, Alexander M Seifalian

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Theranostics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Nano-embedded medical devices and delivery systems in interventional radiology.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Buket Gundogan1. Centre for Nanotechnology & Regenerative Medicine, UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK ; 2. UCL Medical School, University College London, London, UK.
Aaron Tan1. Centre for Nanotechnology & Regenerative Medicine, UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK ; 2. UCL Medical School, University College London, London, UK.
Yasmin Farhatnia1. Centre for Nanotechnology & Regenerative Medicine, UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Mohammad S Alavijeh3. Pharmidex Pharmaceutical Services Ltd., London, UK.
Zhanfeng Cui4. Oxford Centre for Tissue Engineering & Bioprocessing, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Alexander M Seifalian1. Centre for Nanotechnology & Regenerative Medicine, UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK ; 5. Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
London Centre for Nanotechnology · GBPharmidex (United Kingdom) · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBScience Oxford · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C515004/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is one of the most commonly performed invasive medical procedures in medicine today. Since the first coronary balloon angioplasty in 1977, interventional cardiology has seen a wide array of developments in PCI. Bare metal stents (BMS) were soon superseded by the revolutionary drug-eluting stents (DES), which aimed to address the issue of restenosis found with BMS. However, evidence began to mount against DES, with late-stent thrombosis (ST) rates being higher than that of BMS. The bioabsorbable stent may be a promising alternative, providing vessel patency and support for the necessary time required and thereafter degrade into safe non-toxic compounds which are reabsorbed by the body. This temporary presence provides no triggers for ST, which is brought about by non-endothelialized stent struts and drug polymers remaining in vivo for extended periods of time. Likewise, nano-theranostics incorporated into a bioabsorbable stent of the future may provide an incredibly valuable single platform offering both therapeutic and diagnostic capabilities. Such a stent may allow delivery of therapeutic particles to specific sites thus keeping potential toxicity to a minimum, improved ease of tracking delivery in vivo by embedding imaging agents, controlled rate of therapy release and protection of the implanted therapy. Indeed, nanocarriers may allow an increased therapeutic index as well as offer novel post-stent implantation imaging and diagnostic methods for atherosclerosis, restenosis and thrombosis. It is envisioned that a nano-theranostic stent may well form the cornerstone of future stent designs in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsCoronary DiseaseHumansPercutaneous Coronary InterventionStentsbioabsorbable stentdrug-eluting stentnanotechnologytheranostics

Identifiers

PMID24672583
PMCPMC3966055
OpenAlexW1967877472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.